Harry Kane

[kdbrise]

Is the 47m theyve just spent come out of the goverment loan?

That would be Arsenal for their Ben White fee

 

[Coatigan]

Ric's already vouched for you. But I don't know what you want me to say? You're on a transfer forum where information is constantly passed and the information that you've posted in this forum is about 50/50. We're not in the loop on private conversations, we can only go off what you posted on the forum. How else could we judge?

I have no idea who the poster is and what so called tier of itk-ness they are. Nor do i
I either believe or dispute their claim. I do find the whole reaction to it thing very interesting though.

If his 'record' is indeed 50/50, is that not a lot more or at least in line with others. I just find it strange, that posters would rush to discredit one claim, presumably made in good faith. Particularly the same posters that would argue with others over similar claims by other itks, if they happen to be what they want to hear or even vague enough to be interpreted as that. Feels selective. I might be missing a fair bit of background perhaps.

 

[r.soleofsalford]

Surely it does not matter what City or Pep or you or Charlie Kane think Kane is worth. What matters is what Levy thinks he is worth.

And it is not clear that, despite what you lot say, that Levy is a willing seller. In the press he clearly says he is not.

I have doubts that this deal can go through. The differences seem massive.

What really matters is how much your debt is. This new stadium and the debt you owe has been brought into sharper focus by Covid. Unfortunately timed yes.

I think you need to sell Kane. More importantly I think the banks will want you to sell Kane.

 

[Coatigan]

Kane may sulk, but he wont sulk after the window closes, what benifit would it be for him? Surely a City fan would prefer A god like Messi?

Typically, would agree. With Kane, I think it would be a different kind of sulk.

Mahrez sulked, went on strike, got fined, then stayed another season as a professional. So did Ronaldo. Tevez. Coutinho. Suarez. and many more.

They all got their moves though, even if a year later than they wanted. With Kane, I don't think that's an option. Next year, his chance of the move he wants will be far less, so he can't just kick up a little bit of a fuss, sulk for a couple weeks, then if it doesn't work knuckle down for another year. He'd have to fully u-turn. Which he might. But the way he has started and how early suggests it will be win or bust for him. And funnily enough, for City too seemingly.

edit. to answer your question, I'd MUCH rather have Messi myself. Money aside even. But I think it has now got too far and it will and should be Kane.

 

[Coatigan]

With Grealish getting number 10,
Kane will get 9, meaning Jesus will be shipped out. That is my guess

Do you want that?

I ask because I've seen a few giddy at the thought of Kane hving the no.9, even before Grealish was announced as no.10.

I find that fucking bizarre. That we woyld shit so readily on our own current no.9, so another club's player could get his number just because it happens to be the same number he wears for England. Weird.

 

[Nellies left peg]

Typically, would agree. With Kane, I think it would be a different kind of sulk.

Mahrez sulked, went on strike, got fined, then stayed another season as a professional. So did Ronaldo. Tevez. Coutinho. Suarez. and many more.

They all got their moves though, even if a year later than they wanted. With Kane, I don't think that's an option. Next year, his chance of the move he wants will be far less, so he can't just kick up a little bit of a fuss, sulk for a couple weeks, then if it doesn't work knuckle down for another year. He'd have to fully u-turn. Which he might. But the way he has started and how early suggests it will be win or bust for him. And funnily enough, for City too seemingly.

edit. to answer your question, I'd MUCH rather have Messi myself. Money aside even. But I think it has now got too far and it will and should be Kane.

Messi will be delighted with interest from PSG as he can stick to his 6 hard league games a season and save himself for the CL. I am very disappointed in his lack of courage to play in a competitive league in another country. So if Haaland is a no then Kane would be next option. Never thought I'd say it but fair fucks to Ronaldo for plying his trade in different countries and still playing to an exceptional level

 

[JPBB]

What really matters is how much your debt is. This new stadium and the debt you owe has been brought into sharper focus by Covid. Unfortunately timed yes.

I think you need to sell Kane. More importantly I think the banks will want you to sell Kane.

maybe. I don’t think Spurs are at the level of crisis that the banks will intervene. But banks are banks and however shabby you think levy of Spurs are, they nothing compared to the disgusting behaviour a bank is capable of

 

[City14]

Do you want that?

I ask because I've seen a few giddy at the thought of Kane hving the no.9, even before Grealish was announced as no.10.

I find that fucking bizarre. That we woyld shit so readily on our own current no.9, so another club's player could get his number just because it happens to be the same number he wears for England. Weird.

I don’t I would rather we still keep 2 out and out strikers. Kane doesn’t strike as the type to insist on numbers. But I have a feeling if we do offload to make room in the squad, it will be either Jesus or Bernardo.

 

[Coatigan]

I watched the interview. It was as clear as day that the £100m figure was just Kane putting down a marker.

"I mean, he might want to sell me! 'He might be thinking, 'If I could get £100 million for you, then why not?' Do you know what I mean? I'm not going to be worth that for the next two or three years."

It's Harry chancing his arm; trying to set the agenda. Not even the slightest suggestion that it was an actual figure agreed between them.

Why 100m though. Why not set his marker at 80m. Or 90m. Or be extra modest on tv and go 60m. Why mention it at all?

It was deliberate. It wasn't accidental, meaningless, or random.

 

[waspish]

Has Levy paid of what spurs owe to the HMRC yet? Isn’t it 96m