Do you think this is a good look for Spurs? If talented young players feel any future dream moves will be blocked they might not join Spurs in the first place. Why go there when you can join a similar club (in terms of budget) such as Leicester, Dortmund or Sevilla knowing they’ll let you move on if a reasonable bid is made.Kane has been badly advised. Hardly surprising. Charlie does not inspire confidence.
A six year contract and yet he wants to leave. Why?
Briefing the media that he is going without having a deal in place. Why?
Going to war with Levy when you need him to do you a favour. Why?
City may be trying to get to a win/win situation with Spurs but Kane is definitely not doing that with Levy.
And that is a problem.
Why are you defending Levy? He and Lewis are taking the piss out of Spurs fans.Fucked up the Olympic stadium deal? Please explain.
By the way, Spurs don’t lose many players at all. And those that do leave only leave for the richest, most successful clubs.
Umm……..not sure you read my post properly. Where did I claim that Spurs currently are rivalling City? You’re imagining it.
The discussion is about the supposed substance of this gentleman’s agreement. And the claim is that Levy agreed to allow Kane to leave should Spurs not look like competing got honours. I have no problem in conceding that that is now the case.
But that is only one side of the agreement. The other is that another club must pay the asking price. And until that happens, Levy is not honour bound to allow Kane to leave. To which end, contrary to the narrative on here, the only person who appears to be breaking the agreement is Kane.
Think Kane will need to put in a request and forego any loyalty payments then the clubs will settle on a fee around £120-130 mill
What is the point in spurs though? Levy has only financial ambition, your best player wants out, and you are just a blockage that stops the likes of Everton , Arsenal and Villa getting European football.Fucked up the Olympic stadium deal? Please explain.
By the way, Spurs don’t lose many players at all. And those that do leave only leave for the richest, most successful clubs.
Umm……..not sure you read my post properly. Where did I claim that Spurs currently are rivalling City? You’re imagining it.
The discussion is about the supposed substance of this gentleman’s agreement. And the claim is that Levy agreed to allow Kane to leave should Spurs not look like competing got honours. I have no problem in conceding that that is now the case.
But that is only one side of the agreement. The other is that another club must pay the asking price. And until that happens, Levy is not honour bound to allow Kane to leave. To which end, contrary to the narrative on here, the only person who appears to be breaking the agreement is Kane.
let the Rags av arry boy!
Tottenham have already bid 50m on Vlahovic.Kane wants to leave therefore his actions are understandable but I am seeing zero movement. City had leverage over Grealish. We have leverage over Kane, but that gives us only weak and indirect leverage over Levy.
If Spurs start to make enquiries over centre-forwards I shall start getting excited otherwise I am assuming that this has stalled. This does not mean I accept your arguments, I am just simply commenting that the transfer seems stuck
Where exactly are we with all this? I mean, have City actually put in a bid for Kane? There's been a lot of talk about the two clubs being £40 million apart in their valuations but until City make a concrete offer there's nothing for Levy/Spurs to move an inch from.I don't have your contacts so all I see are the public positions and as far as I see it Spurs have not moved an inch. I would love to be wrong.
Why are you defending Levy? He and Lewis are taking the piss out of Spurs fans.
Why though? League's best striker can't go to those cnuts.let the Rags av arry boy!