Harry Kane

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Purely bait to get the Rag's interested.

 

[blue ranger]

He’s worth about 50 m at best.

Genuinely how can you say that. He has a brilliant record for Spurs and England. Only doubt would be the ankle injuries. But only him, Lewandowski and Mbappe would give a 100% guarantee to replace Aguero goals and Lewandowski is getting on a bit like Sergio.

 

[NorthamptonBlue]

Genuinely how can you say that. He has a brilliant record for Spurs and England. Only doubt would be the ankle injuries. But only him, Lewandowski and Mbappe would give a 100% guarantee to replace Aguero goals and Lewandowski is getting on a bit like Sergio.

That just leaves Mbappe then. Works for me.

 

[ctid1894]

Genuinely how can you say that. He has a brilliant record for Spurs and England. Only doubt would be the ankle injuries. But only him, Lewandowski and Mbappe would give a 100% guarantee to replace Aguero goals and Lewandowski is getting on a bit like Sergio.

Why on earth do people keep coming out with this bullshit. No player comes with a guarantee, ever.

 

[manimanc]

 

[alexmcity]

200m for Mbappe? Very well.

200m for Kane? Absurd.

 

[RayCTID]

 

[MillsyTheMosher]

Genuinely how can you say that. He has a brilliant record for Spurs and England. Only doubt would be the ankle injuries. But only him, Lewandowski and Mbappe would give a 100% guarantee to replace Aguero goals and Lewandowski is getting on a bit like Sergio.

He’s a crock. Due to him being a crock he’s worth 50 at best. If you think he’s worth more then all
I can say is thank god you have no involvement in the clubs transfer policy.

As for him being ‘guaranteed’ to replace the goals Aguero has delivered all I can say is hahahahaha.

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

 

[citytill1die84]

He’s a crock. Due to him being a crock he’s worth 50 at best. If you think he’s worth more then all
I can say is thank god you have no involvement in the clubs transfer policy.

As for him being ‘guaranteed’ to replace the goals Aguero has delivered all I can say is hahahahaha.

Lol he's easily worth more than 50m stop being a tool pal and catch up it's 2020 ffs.

 

[Ardwick Green Blue]

 

[MillsyTheMosher]

Lol he's easily worth more than 50m stop being a tool pal and catch up it's 2020 ffs.

You clearly have no understanding of how serious his persistent ankle injuries are. Weapon.

 

[doobyedoobye]

Well Tolmie hinted and now it's alive

 

[hihosilva]

I think Kane would be a great addition but 200mil you're avin a laff

 

[citytill1die84]

You clearly have no understanding of how serious his persistent ankle injuries are. Weapon.

Lol you clearly have no understanding of transfer valuations. Numpty

 

[chesterbells]

I’m sure whatever figure gets mentioned would probably be the fee Spurs would ask, plus 6 years of his wages, plus agent fees, plus add ons for winning every available trophy and personal award for 6 years - and then rounded up. In other words the biggest figure possible to make it look as bad/good as possible.

 

[MillsyTheMosher]

Lol you clearly have no understanding of transfer valuations. Numpty

As I say- If you genuinely think City will pay more than 50m for Harry ‘the crock’ Kane you are a fool.

 

[ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN]

That’s tomorrow papers sold then

 

[pudge]

Well Tolmie hinted and now it's alive

It's as alive as the dodo

 

[MCFC1993]

It's obviously bollocks, we aren't paying £200m for anyone.

I would take him in a heartbeat though, anywhere around £100m and we should be all over it.