Harry Kane

[Tevez City]

100m for 28 years old ( with no resale value ) + concerning injury record is a bad investment.

 

[Deleted member 87819]

For Kane to come out with this he must have assurances from a club that they want him and willing to pay big!

Messi?

 

[waspish]

I see Chelsea buying him don’t care that there is a rivalry if there is only one club and it’s chelsea who are willing to buy him Kane wouldn’t care one bit!

 

[OB1]

Would prefer Messi for a year and then pay Haaland's release clause but that is probably fairytale stuff.

Kane would fit in well at City and score more than he does at Spurs. He'll be 28 next season so not convinced he is beyond a bit of pressing.

He'll link play well in addition to scoring, and create space for other players to score goals too.

Downsides are that he wouldn't bring searing pace but would bring those ankles.

 

[Gumzy97]

 

[Deleted member 87819]

I see Chelsea buying him don’t care that there is a rivalry if there is only one club and it’s chelsea who are willing to buy him Kane wouldn’t care one bit!

I could see that too but still think PSG makes the most sense

 

[Lemon7277]

Now the airports are up and running you know what scottish piss can will be patrolling arrivals with his bit of cardboard

 

[Mancity0303]

100m for 28 years old ( with no resale value ) + concerning injury record is a bad investment.

Do you want to win 3-4 PL trophies the next 5 years?

 

[vincent]

100m for 28 years old ( with no resale value ) + concerning injury record is a bad investment.

Just perhaps Pep disagrees with you

 

[waspish]

He goes missing in big games and do nothing till the end ,he wouldnt press like pep demands and how old is he ? If we dropping a hundred million it had better be someone young , eager and energetic

I wouldn’t worry about him going missing in big games, he goes missing because his team don’t retain the ball..