Harry Kane

[Del_Bosque]

from a PR point of view having the England captain and getting him regular trophies and to the all time top scorer isn’t going to do you any harm is it

 

[Goater=Legend]

Dear me, imagine replacing Aguero with another striker that guarantees 20+ plus goals a season and people think it's the wrong move

 

[waspish]

I feel though it ain’t city who are in for him because we don’t tell players we want to say They want out!

This is the scum scousers or Chelsea trade mark all over it..

 

[I'm With Stupid]

Because the injuries add up. look at Rooney, by the age of 30 he was nowhere near the player he once was, we would probably have Kane at his best for 2-3 years before the injuries start to mount up and we have to look to move his wages and go back for another.

Was Rooney injury prone? I always saw Rooney as a player who just developed early and finished his career earlier. He already looked about 45 when he came through the ranks at Everton.

 

[citytill1die84]

If Haaland doesn't join this for me is a must he'll bag 40 goals a season.

 

[Metal Biker]

Can we add two more options to the poll?

Yes, with an if

No, with a but

 

[WestGorton]

At the right deal it's obviously a yes but no idea what that deal would be in the present environment.

 

[Withnail]

Good striker, but too injury prone and if we are going to bid for a Spurs player we should be going for Son.

 

[kaz7]

Do you want to win 3-4 PL trophies the next 5 years?

Only if his ankles get better..... We win without him

 

[Double R]

Like most I would prefer Haaland, but Kane would be a fabulous alternative. I think these two as first and second choice signings, are far ahead of any other alternatives, including the likes of Lukaku, Martinez, Ings and Silva.