Harry Kane

As much as I like Kane I am not comfortable with us paying in excess of £100 million to get him.

Ings at £30 million would have been worth a gamble for me.
Why tho. Not your money. You're a fan not an accountant for city. Always find it bizarre when fans worry about how much we spending on a certain player
 
It's comments like that that make you look like you've been a City fan for about 5 minutes.
also what's the implication here? that if we somehow survived 2 more minutes without giving away a penalty and won on pens that we wouldn't need a striker anymore? people not to stop evaluating things based on the last event they remember
 
People still moaning about fees in here is getting boring. If we didn't sign anyone then there would be uproar. 120m/130m for the best, available striker currently available in world football. It is what it is. You're not gonna be on beans on toast for tea are you if City decide thats what they're willing to pay. Just let it go ffs.
 
It's comments like that that make you look like you've been a City fan for about 5 minutes.

A close loss with the academy lads in a glorified friendly against a full-strength Leicester? Why haven't we signed the league's best striker for over £120m in the next twenty-four hours FFS, banter club
 
Cash flow issues at their parent company in China.

They have sold Hakimi after one season and haven't replaced him yet. Looking at Bargain bin replacements for Lukaku. Most of the cash will be going back to China.

Can't be anything to do with the fact that they're famously on the verge of total financial collapse could it?
Seriously didn’t know how deep they are in shit now . Thought it wasn’t as bad it seems .
Tell inter we’ll raise you 1 million more then what chelsea’s offer for lump.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.