Thats because Liverpool had a rough injury run. Chelsea were clueless with lampard. Chelsea have a star squad nowlmao ffs we won the league by double digits last season pipe down
Thats because Liverpool had a rough injury run. Chelsea were clueless with lampard. Chelsea have a star squad nowlmao ffs we won the league by double digits last season pipe down
glad we agree on the first partNo it doesn't. But not signing Kane ensures that we are not winning CL or maybe prem
Wouldnt you just love to play monopoly with BlueabroadNot being funny.
Why don't you throw Sterling in as well?
£80mill.
£60mill - Jesus. (being generous)
£60mill - La Porte. (being generous again)
£200mill! Good one! Arf!
Rather than Kane's price staying the same as reported, £150mill, Spurs fans in general, and some City fans think Kane's price should be more than £150mill. Even as high as £200mill. LoL!
Thank f*** they aren't doing the negotiating with Levy.
And what is your prognosis if we do sign Kane?No it doesn't. But not signing Kane ensures that we are not winning CL or maybe prem
Improved chances. We can atleast give a decent fight and hope for it.And what is your prognosis if we do sign Kane?
No it doesn't.No it doesn't. But not signing Kane ensures that we are not winning CL or maybe prem
His potential suitors v his current employers? That one?What's the awkward game on Sat?
Well if you think we can win against teams like Chelsea, psg, Bayern in important games without playing a striker then good luck with that.No it doesn't.