Harry Kane

[bluesteel]

Isn't it great to see City fans deride one of the most important figures in our recent success?

"Don't want Kane, but want Sterling even less."

You said that not me.

But I’ll expand, I don’t want us to pay £100M+ for an injury prone, soon to be 28 year old who I have reservations about when he comes up against elite defenders as he’s not worth it.

I don’t want Sterling on the left as I think he’s crap there and he now can’t get a look in on right wing, his finishing is no better than when he arrived too.

If we can swap Sterling for Kane and spend the budget on Grealish I’ll be happy as we’ll be a stronger team.

I also think Utd would be a lot better with Kane (and that’s where I think he’ll end up anyway).

Ideally I would swap Sterling for Grealish and sign Joao Felix but that’s not going to happen. I think we’d struggle to get a fair value for Sterling so using him in a deal for Kane makes sense.

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

Kane talks like he's chomping on a gob full of doner kebab, it's a no from me.

Jesus and Sterling articulate themselves beautifully but need 10 chances to score a goal. It's a yes from me :)

 

[foggy1974]

It’s just funny knowing that the Rags will be playing second fiddle to us again

They are a fucked up club in so many ways

Why would anyone wanting trophies want the Rags

They're gonna offer silly monetary for him, the rabble will be close to rioting again if he ends up here

 

[I'm Blue]

Would be an incredible signing imo.

The man is an animal in front of goal, very good at scoring from outside the box and is also very adept at "making his own" goals.

If we get him, it kills two birds.

Makes us stronger and stops our rivals getting stronger.

I'm in.

We buy Kane and our rivals go for Haaland.
Who’s stronger then? Especially long term.

 

[HelloCity]

One thing is for certain, moving to a false-9 formation for our biggest games would be a thing of the past.

What we should remember from history is that no matter how good things seem, if you don’t change or you don’t improve then the season after winning the title can be much much harder.

 

[hammocity]

Nailed on for the rags

 

[Zin 'messiah' Zimmer]

His body wouldn’t live up to Peps demands, we all know it..

Not a prayer we spunk 150m on him, great player but he won’t be the same in 2/3 years, not with the injuries he’s had!

 

[blue cigar]

Haaland any day before Kane, he'll be better than Kane, he's younger and fearless.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Think 50m, Jesus & Sterling would be satisfy all parties.

Sterling would be deployed as a RW (fits his abilities) & Jesus would get a run as the main man in attack.

Sterling is originally from london too, so doubt he’d be against that move.

£125 million we buy Pierre-Emile Højbjerg loan him back for a season and leave Kane there as an experienced senior player (example Jonathan Soriano Barca B).

They sell the players not pulling their weight or use the 100 mil to pay them off. We send our CFG/EDS loanees to Tottenham to get them some experience and develop. They get to taste success in the Europa league and develop young players as our feeder.

The link formalised and the officially come under CFG umbrella and they are forced to drop down the leagues as our B team, and by the time they have hit league 1 and are ground sharing with Barnet we install Mario Balotelli as coach for his first crack at management.

 

[Blu1]

Nailed on for the rags

Agree