Harry Kane

[mccity]

fabrizio romano has reported for the tenth time that we're interested in Kane :o

Romeo whilst I remember bookmark this https://twitter.com/City_Xtra

They generally do a good aggregate of all City news throughout the day, so you don't need to worry about being left behind when you check into the thread every day.

 

[balotelli's back pocket]

Think we could do yes, we’ll have a better chance with Kane, but I also wouldn’t be writing us off with Jesus and false 9.

Of course we would have a chance, but there's a big difference between thinking we can win it and believing we will win it.

Liverpool have Salah, United have Fernandes, Chelsea have Lukaku. They'll all score 30 goals this season. That's what we need Kane for.

Pep pulled off a miracle last season, it's unwise to expect him to do it again. Which is why, in the end, we will pay the money and Kane will be a City player.

 

[MadchesterCity]

Why, if he doesn’t come we will probably go as we are so won’t need a deadline.

Which most likely won't be strong enough to win the league hence my concerns

 

[MCFC1993]

Anyone still think we'll win the league without a top striker?

Luckily we're getting one.

We can't do the season without a striker, Kane is the only top one available. Need to get this one through ASAP, we've got a tough start to the season and we're going to need an instant impact.

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

Of course we would have a chance, but there's a big difference between thinking we can win it and believing we will win it.

Liverpool have Salah, United have Fernandes, Chelsea have Lukaku. They'll all score 30 goals this season. That's what we need Kane for.

Pep pulled off a miracle last season, it's unwise to expect him to do it again. Which is why, in the end, we will pay the money and Kane will be a City player.

In a nutshell. Good post

 

[mosssideblue]

Which most likely won't be string enough to win the league hence my concerns

But your solution was to pull out from Kane before the window closes and start a new pursuit of Haaland, which would have a success probability of zero. Not the best tactic don't you think?

 

[MadchesterCity]

I said weeks ago that getting Kane (as he's obviously the only one we want) will be the difference between potentially winning nothing or everything

100% agree with this although I'd add if we can't get Kane we must also look for option with Haaland

 

[MadchesterCity]

Of course we would have a chance, but there's a big difference between thinking we can win it and believing we will win it.

Liverpool have Salah, United have Fernandes, Chelsea have Lukaku. They'll all score 30 goals this season. That's what we need Kane for.

Pep pulled off a miracle last season, it's unwise to expect him to do it again. Which is why, in the end, we will pay the money and Kane will be a City player.

Brilliant post

 

[Romeo_451]

since spurs fans believed the 150m+ bernardo rumor from an ITK, maybe they'll believe this one aswell?

 

[MadchesterCity]

But your solution was to pull out from Kane before the window closes and start a new pursuit of Haaland, which would have a success probability of zero. Not the best tactic don't you think?

My solution is to set a deadline to apply pressure on Spurs, if they don't play ball, then put in huge bid for Haaland publicly. We still know what's happening with Kane but we must get a top striker. I don't trust Spurs or Levy and they could easily be stringing us along meaning we miss out on a striker. In business it is important to keep your options open