Harry Kane

City can walk away at any point. Levy has a 28 year old forward that does not want to play for the club. I don’t see the situation so one sided.

Kane is to blame for not inserting a clause.

Levy maybe winning the PR war but that is all. City are not desperate for a forward. It would help but once we are up and running city will still be in the mix.
Couldn’t disagree more.

Kane will have no choice but to crack on and score goals for Spurs if he doesn’t get his move so it’s irrelevant wether at this moment in time he doesn’t want to play for Spurs.

City ARE desperate for a forward. The club has basically admitted we are desperate to sign him.
 
Lots of reasons, but for starters using two games at the start of a season against top quality opposition with half the side missing and minimal preseason for the other as a microcosm of things would be the dumbest thing Daniel Levy could ever do.
You could argue the other way and suggest Spurs don’t need Kane as they beat the champions without him. Think we should lower our offer to £30m
 
City can walk away at any point. Levy has a 28 year old forward that does not want to play for the club. I don’t see the situation so one sided.

Kane is to blame for not inserting a clause.

Levy maybe winning the PR war but that is all. City are not desperate for a forward. It would help but once we are up and running city will still be in the mix.
We are absolutely gagging for a forward.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.