Couldn’t disagree more.City can walk away at any point. Levy has a 28 year old forward that does not want to play for the club. I don’t see the situation so one sided.
Kane is to blame for not inserting a clause.
Levy maybe winning the PR war but that is all. City are not desperate for a forward. It would help but once we are up and running city will still be in the mix.
Lots of reasons, but for starters using two games at the start of a season against top quality opposition with half the side missing and minimal preseason for the other as a microcosm of things would be the dumbest thing Daniel Levy could ever do.Why not?
You could argue the other way and suggest Spurs don’t need Kane as they beat the champions without him. Think we should lower our offer to £30mLots of reasons, but for starters using two games at the start of a season against top quality opposition with half the side missing and minimal preseason for the other as a microcosm of things would be the dumbest thing Daniel Levy could ever do.
Yeah. I prefer this idea.You could argue the other way and suggest Spurs don’t need Kane as they beat the champions without him. Think we should lower our offer to £30m
Still a lot of money for a left back.Yeah. I prefer this idea.
Just a small edit ;-)The flappers on here thinking we've lost out from ONE game is predictable!!!!
Ah losing the Charity Shield and seeing Spurs beat Arsenal in the Mind trophy. Yes he probably thinks Spurs will finish above us nowI said ten days so I mean two games plus the way rivals have started.
We are absolutely gagging for a forward.City can walk away at any point. Levy has a 28 year old forward that does not want to play for the club. I don’t see the situation so one sided.
Kane is to blame for not inserting a clause.
Levy maybe winning the PR war but that is all. City are not desperate for a forward. It would help but once we are up and running city will still be in the mix.