manimanc
Well-Known Member
We all was but after last week we knew today would be tough.I know mate, was just expecting a bit more today. Early days still
We got 37 games to save ourselves.
We all was but after last week we knew today would be tough.I know mate, was just expecting a bit more today. Early days still
The only problem is Levy isn’t a great business man, putting your fingers in your ears and just saying no doesn’t count btw.If he had said “Harry Kane is a great player, we need to speak to him and convince him to stay”
thankfully the likes that run spurs and City don’t work off one games
Is that a reputable info? Bad weekend for you guys tooWell it would seem Spurs are looking at Bamford as a potential Kane replacement so I guess we are now actually involved.
Plus a wantaway player, who will have to be kept away from the dressing room and a mop of spuds fans who now hate his gutsBut we’re not going to bid against ourselves are we? We’re holding a knife at each other’s throat. The reported £120 million plus realistic add ons £150 million is reasonable all round I think. Beyond that you can argue until the cows come home who loses out more for no sale. City going into a season without a striker, same as last season (although we didn’t know that at the time), or Spurs with their huge stadium that needs paying off on the back of a COVID affected season and no other asset that is going to be worth the same amount next year?
In my humble opinion we get affected for a season, Spurs get affected for a decade.