Yea I heard Neville say that. I was only told that sky said “he was in the stadium” that’s why I said apparently
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Bluesince88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2021
- Messages
- 980
- Team supported
- City
We wanted Grealish, he had a buy out clause. Even that dragged still a bit but why he was first through the door. Do you think it’s good business to say to him, we want you but let us fuck about with Levy all summer then we will grab you last minute? This isn’t delayed because of Grealish, it’s negotiating with Spurs which by all accounts sounded like they wanted this game out the way. Unsure why people think Haaland is desperate to come to us.To be honest we should have signed a striker first before going after Grealish. It's such a weird logic from the people dealing with transfers. The most needed position we need a new player in is in the striker role. If we don't sign a striker this season they've failed. And since the club is runned like a business structure, there should be repercussions.
McfcBibby
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 312
- Location
- Formerly known as Bibbyblue85
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Yeah good one! You’re fooling nobodyYea I heard Neville say that. I was only told that sky said “he was in the stadium” that’s why I said apparently
OkYeah good one! You’re fooling nobody
Even if you sign a striker should you have signed Grealish before a LB?To be honest we should have signed a striker first before going after Grealish. It's such a weird logic from the people dealing with transfers.
The most needed position we actually need reinforcement in, was/is the striker role. If we don't sign a striker this season they've failed. And since the club is runned like a business, there should be repercussions on that.
He was apparently. Many spurs fans were saying the same. Maybe they heard on sky as everybody, I don't knowYeah good one! You’re fooling nobody
Last edited:
LesBleuMiserable
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2011
- Messages
- 3,262
Spotted dick
I would have thought the win may have made him think Spursy don’t need Kane and better to cash in and spend a little bit of the money on a cheap replacementlets be honest if Levy was watching the same game he saw as well we are desperate for a top finisher. if he cannot use this game as a tool to negotiate a better deal he is a fool.
Bluesince88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2021
- Messages
- 980
- Team supported
- City
I think we knew nobody would want Mendy and Zinchenko is more than capable for another year.Even if you sign a striker should you have signed Grealish before a LB?
No he definitely played upfront but the lad does a great job of being invisible. Not really digging the lad out he’s just not got a presence about him that a proper striker like Kane or Sergio gives.Maybe not but whatever position he was playing it was largely ineffective and that presence upfront is needed. Torres is not the answer. I’d argue it was a false 9 at times as it seemed Grealish played quite central up top, regardless playing someone out of position to lead the line won’t work
At this stage of the window...I think notWe shouldn't be putting all our eggs into Kane's basket. If he gets injured then we'll be snookered, playing the false 9 stuff again. We should be looking at buying two strikers imo.