Harry Kane

alexmcity said:
Why would a player go from City to Spurs when Spurs look hopeless even with Kane in there? Both Sterling and Jesus could go to a CL team, in England or Spain or Italy, a team with much better chances to compete. It's amazing that some people couldn't see things from their perspective. Next year Sterling and Jesus will be one year away from leaving on free and could attract interest from much better clubs than Spurs. It's brainless to think they will accept a move to Spurs.
Click to expand...

i think spurs will have a great season next year with or without kane
once they get over jose being manager and get a good manager in the summer they will be right up there

now if kane leaves it will just improve them with the money and new players and maybe sterling could be the poster boy for them and kick start something ? sterling will not be happy sitting on the bench next season if things are going to be like they was in the 2nd part of the season at city.

he is at the stage that he demands to be playing every week and its not about money. i got the same feeling when sterling signed for city from liverpool ? its was about playing and winning medals over money. now sterling been dropped from pep starting 11 or should i say champions league team. i think it hurt him and maybe he wants a move other than city wanting to sell him

pep said last week in a interview some of the bigger players in the squad will not be happy in the summer because they will be asked to move on its football ??
 
I still think if we can get one of sterling or Jesus to spurs for Kane it'd be a marvelous deal. Be ruthless - they are good players, but Kane is way better.
 
Matt.D said:
My point is that if Kane was definitely going to United and we were being labelled as favourites every day in the press (as we are) we would definitely have briefed by now or at least given a steer to a few city Journos that we aren’t involved, as we did with Mendes.

I know the context of what Kane said about De Bruyne as I’ve seen the whole interview but you just don’t say that the one player you feel would improve your game is KDB if your on the verge of signing for the rags and you certainly don’t say Foden is playing for the best team in the world.

I’m not saying he will definitely come here, just that it’s clearly not v close being done with the rags as the other lad has heard.
Click to expand...

Think with Mendes, there were actual claims that the deal was done and a figure was quoted (60m). With still a few games. The rest, yeah I get that.
 
ancoats said:
i think spurs will have a great season next year with or without kane
once they get over jose being manager and get a good manager in the summer they will be right up there

now if kane leaves it will just improve them with the money and new players and maybe sterling could be the poster boy for them and kick start something ? sterling will not be happy sitting on the bench next season if things are going to be like they was in the 2nd part of the season at city.

he is at the stage that he demands to be playing every week and its not about money. i got the same feeling when sterling signed for city from liverpool ? its was about playing and winning medals over money. now sterling been dropped from pep starting 11 or should i say champions league team. i think it hurt him and maybe he wants a move other than city wanting to sell him

pep said last week in a interview some of the bigger players in the squad will not be happy in the summer because they will be asked to move on its football ??
Click to expand...
Spurs aren't going to be paying the wages Raz would be looking for.
 
samuelyeboah said:
I still think if we can get one of sterling or Jesus to spurs for Kane it'd be a marvelous deal. Be ruthless - they are good players, but Kane is way better.
Click to expand...
We don't have to swap them to Spurs though right? Wasn't Juve interested in Jesus a while ago? I don't know if they have the money, but if you buy Kane for 120m and sell Gabby for around 60m you'd essentially buy him for 60m. It only looks better when you do a swap deal and have to pay Spurs less money.
 
Larry Stranger said:
We don't have to swap them to Spurs though right? Wasn't Juve interested in Jesus a while ago? I don't know if they have the money, but if you buy Kane for 120m and sell Gabby for around 60m you'd essentially buy him for 60m. It only looks better when you do a swap deal and have to pay Spurs less money.
Click to expand...
Well if you sell Gabby then fail to get Kane you're nearing the end of the window with 0 natural strikers.. panic kicks in, that's how you end up with Danny Ings
 
samuelyeboah said:
Don't think that was ever the risk.. he's already got a contract till 2024. The question is is he willing to make it a big issue and to go public should he not get his move. My guess is no, which will make him moving this summer basically impossible
Click to expand...
Not a chance Kane will move this summer, he's full of shit, he'll do a typical Spursy and bottle out
 
Their gave been a couple of rumours of Levy wanting Poch back at Spurs.
Wonder whether that could have any impact.
 
vmsuhail said:
Kane doesn't have the pace of Sterling. It's not a guarantee he'll get to the end of those through balls.
Click to expand...

Imagine being the best passer/crosser of a ball in World football, but not being able to consider the pace of a team mate.

I'm certain De Bruyne is capable of allowing/adjusting for such intricacies.
 
ancoats said:
city do have options and kane or haaland even mbappe. so let them make the move and city can just sit down and wait for the phone to ring. for me haaland would be a better choice with value long term ? kane would be 5 years max and possible no return in value with him walking away for free

am still hearing that united are spending big in the summer and the glazers have given the go ahead to OGS for £500 million investment in the first team ? but manchester city hold all the cards in kane and city are picking up trophies every season and its not a project build and need 3 seasons to win the title

city and pep know the title next season will be the hardest to win and liverpool chelsea will invest and improve
but as for utd take away the luck they have had with VAR this season ? then its a bigger job than the other 3 big teams i know for a fact if united don't hit the ground running next season it could get ugly pretty quick and where do they go from there ?
Click to expand...

NearEarnestBarbet-small.gif
 
birchwoodgingerste said:
60mill and a player swap and its a starter for sure
Click to expand...
I don't get this logic, we'll still be paying £100m+
"If" we were to swap Raz or Gabby then either player would need replacing.
So we'd still be spending £100m+, it would just mean we haven't spent that on a single transfer in relative terms but would still be spending in that transfer window.
Only benefit I can see is BT Sport won't be able to say £120m Kane.
 
wayne71 said:
Your ridiculous post got the reply it deserved.

Why on earth would Sterling (who would walk into most teams in the world) in his prime take a massive pay cut and drop down to go and play for a shambolic Spurs team?
Click to expand...
Whether you thought it was ridiculous or not, he was expressing his opinion as he is entitled to.

Your response was just abusive and insulting. You were totally out of order and, if you struggle that much with someone having a differing viewpoint, then maybe a public forum is not for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top