Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
800 crosses swinging into penalty area every game watching a massive meat head defender clear it easily?? No we dont want kane fukin jokers!!
Don’t you need pace and a swift turn of direction to close opposition players down ?Kane can give us at least good 6-7 years if he stays fit. He's not someone relying on pace, or just 1 or 2 attributes
One thing I hope we don't do is put all our eggs in the Haaland 2022 basket and go this season without a number 9. Like we did in 2019/20 with the CB position.
It’s not our problem whether Kane wants to win trophies, he’s a Spurs player and will be until 2024We aren't charity FC but we also need a replacement for Aguero. Arrogance has proven bad for lots of clubs, and we have seen it all play out.
What is your point? Kane is too slow and cant change direction quickly enough to be at City?Don’t you need pace and a swift turn of direction to close opposition players down ?
I can see Messi on a free with a huge wage bill more than I can see Kane or Haaland.I would doubt that would happen.
Here is a hypothetical choice. Messi this year and Haaland next year (no striker this year), or Kane this year?
Great post. Too many take fifa games literally and see players fall off a cliff at 30I don't understand how Kane is "short term"
Comparatively to Haaland yea obviously but in general terms he isn't short term at all
Like we spent £60mil on Mahrez when he was 27 and he's one of the first names on the team sheet 3 years later and is at the top of his game
Barcelona signed Suarez at 27 and he's their 2nd record goalscorer of all time
Haaland is the long term option(and my prefered one), but that doesn't make Kane a short term one
Lewandowski (32), Benzema (33), Ronaldo (36), Suarez (34), Immobile (31) are all in the top 5 goal scorers in their respective leagues
We'd get a world class option for 4/5 years...nothing 'short term' about signing Kane
Just seen the poll lmfao. Kane is the best option out there for us, how is that so difficult to see