Harry Kane

1) It looks less likely City will get Kane so why not go for an alternative , surely there are other good ST's out there which are much more attainable?

Looks more likely than ever. No denials from any of the parties anymore as they'd just look ridiculous.
Go for an alternative? Do you think that these are bids that are made on a whim? This has been months in the making, and City and Harry have only come this far because they know it is likely to happen.

2) A lot of people at the end of last week were saying its done. Those people have shown to be liars. It is clearly not done and Spurs and City are still some distance with their valuations. The closer we get to the end of the window the more it looks like he won't go to City.

(All my opinion of course)

How have they been shown to be liars? Do you know that the deal is not done? You say that it clearly isn't... I wonder what insider knowledge you'd base that upon.

Perhaps you ought to spend your time more productively. Go petition your chairman for some quality new player purchases. Because you know damned well that he wants to throw City's 9-Figure cheque on your Billion Pound Debt Millstone.
 
Spurs fan here again


1) It looks less likely City will get Kane so why not go for an alternative , surely there are other good ST's out there which are much more attainable?

2) A lot of people at the end of last week were saying its done. Those people have shown to be liars. It is clearly not done and Spurs and City are still some distance with their valuations. The closer we get to the end of the window the more it looks like he won't go to City.

(All my opinion of course)
Dont come on here calling blues liars , cheeky c
 
So Kane has £50 million (your figure, not mine) just lying in his bank account to be able to buy out his contract? Not sure about that. He might have £10 million but not £50 million. Or do you think he's expecting City to advance him this money ?

he could easy have £50 million in the bank ?
you hope at the age 28 he would have been wise and invest in something maybe property

also i think he could go to a bank or somebody and lend him the money then pay them back with a deal from city
 
What is a worry is pep saying that if we don’t get a striker we will fine going into the new season with what we have I mean one game in and you can clear as day it’s not gonna work this season . We will lose the Kane arguing over £20 million instead of just fucking paying it and then take it from there .
He’s not going to say if we don’t get a striker “we may as well not turn up cause we’re fucked”
 
What is a worry is pep saying that if we don’t get a striker we will fine going into the new season with what we have I mean one game in and you can clear as day it’s not gonna work this season . We will lose the Kane arguing over £20 million instead of just fucking paying it and then take it from there .
We are already offering too much. Let them keep him. We might not won it with him either.

Also, don't use 1 game with 2 of our best attacking players out. And 2 of our best defenders also out.

We can do this without a Striker. It would be easier with a great striker who fits.

I'm not fussed either way
 
Spurs fan here again


1) It looks less likely City will get Kane so why not go for an alternative , surely there are other good ST's out there which are much more attainable?

2) A lot of people at the end of last week were saying its done. Those people have shown to be liars. It is clearly not done and Spurs and City are still some distance with their valuations. The closer we get to the end of the window the more it looks like he won't go to City.

(All my opinion of course)
Imagine liking this post. Well done @Sam1980
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.