Harry Kane

[Cobwebcat]

I was young naive child who does not writing this and was suprised I actually had a blue moon account today.. hopefully my spelling has improved.

Read that back. I’m none the wiser.

 

[Stoned Rose]

well if the fee is agreed, i doubt Kane would play and risk an injury even if he's "still their player"

Let's see what happens then.

 

[Maly]

It's a complete legal minefield and would likely be tied up in the courts for years. While it's technically possible for players to buy out a contract, it's a practical impossibility

Ah, so the reason it’s never been invoked is because it would ruin their career ala Bosman?

 

[Barcon]

Knew you was posh.

Mum moved us to Failsworth the first time I said tooth furry.

 

[Luizo]

Spurs fan here again


1) It looks less likely City will get Kane so why not go for an alternative , surely there are other good ST's out there which are much more attainable?

2) A lot of people at the end of last week were saying its done. Those people have shown to be liars. It is clearly not done and Spurs and City are still some distance with their valuations. The closer we get to the end of the window the more it looks like he won't go to City.

(All my opinion of course)

 

[stan bowles]

a player is valued by the mount of contract left ? kane could even buy himself out of spurs for about £50million
so that is the true value to the club. like i said you can not put a price on what he's done or goals he score and say your buying that as well. if that was the case clubs could put a money back guarantee clause if he did not score 40 goals a season

how bad does kane want the move ? would he go down the route of kicking off and buying out his contract ?
if kane wants the move that bad then sorry spurs have to sell and not hold him to ransom and make him stay

So Kane has £50 million (your figure, not mine) just lying in his bank account to be able to buy out his contract? Not sure about that. He might have £10 million but not £50 million. Or do you think he's expecting City to advance him this money ?

 

[Eoiyflem]

Ah, so the reason it’s never been invoked is because it would ruin their career ala Bosnian?

Kind of, yeah There are all sorts of hoops to jump through, it has to be 3 years after they sign or something, they have to pay the club compensation, there are restrictions following the contract termination, it has to be after the season finishes and all sorts of things that basically mean it's never going to be worth it

 

[manimanc]

Spurs fan here again


1) It looks less likely City will get Kane so why not go for an alternative , surely there are other good ST's out there which are much more attainable?

2) A lot of people at the end of last week were saying its done. Those people have shown to be liars. It is clearly not done and Spurs and City are still some distance with their valuations. The closer we get to the end of the window the more it looks like he won't go to City.

(All my opinion of course)

Yeah thanks. We'll have Son off you, he needs medals and titles for his performances, he's wasting his best years being spursy.

 

[Barcon]

Spurs fan here again


1) It looks less likely City will get Kane

Why's that?

 

[manimanc]

CR7 could be a very good short term answer saving the club millions.

Stop calling the prick CR bastard 7.