HazelByker?
HazelByker?
is this a organised infestation at the momement , you are obsessed with money , money wont help you as levy wont spend it , did you make top four with kane and son last season ?Why would Spurs brief the press about an article criticising Levy? Clear where the article came from, has Charlie's mitts all over it. Entire artciel is basically Kane's camp moaning in the press.....'sources close to the player etc etc'
I think you miscalculate Spurs my friend. We don't need the money, hence why we aren't accepting a derisory 125 million. We have our value and if it isn't met, Kane stays and will probably win the golden boot this season. We don't lose out. You could sign Haaland next summer? For a start that isn't a given anyway, there will be lots of competition for him. Our best chance of CL football is Kane staying and playing upfront with Son. Or we sell him for 160 million and replace hopefully with two quality attackers.
The main issue seems with the whole saga is City are trying to get Kane for a low ball figure. Just 25 million more than Grealish is an insult, Kane's so much more effective and is exactly what City need.
Depends with Kane they might be aiming for 7th, without him 9th might be target, I thought places were about 4-6m in prize funds each so is Kane likely to only drop 8-12m in value over the season, it’s unlikely IMOA chairman trying to get maximum value for his assets who would have thought it.. Kanes value will be lower next season but is that a bad thing for spurs, who will get another season from Kane..
ahhh thanks ive not caught up yet
Let me guess. We should go for Haaland instead?Looks like we're not getting Kane. Buzzing. Let's move on.
Where did you get this from?Looks like we're not getting Kane. Buzzing. Let's move on.
Que?Looks like we're not getting Kane. Buzzing. Let's move on.
Excellent idea.Let me guess. We should go for Haaland instead?