Harry Kane

is this a organised infestation at the momement , you are obsessed with money , money wont help you as levy wont spend it , did you make top four with kane and son last season ?
No they didn't. Nearly finished 6th though. :-)
 
Seen summat saying Kane has hired a new PR firm and Charlie taking a back seat in on-going negotiations.
Anyone else seen it?
A twitter post on Spuds forum..

You don't hire a PR firm to get a transfer.

You don't hire a PR firm if you're just going to slink back into Spurs training and play for them.


The only reason Harry Kane would need a PR firm would be to rescue or massage his reputation with Tottenham fans when he leaves.
 
We are rich, and we have the best owners in the league. It doesnt mean we can spend as much as we perhaps would like because of regulations that are out of our control. This cant possible be news to you?
Having already"felt a pinch" do you seriously think the club would willingly set itself up to fail FFP?

I could be miles of piste, but I wonder if the club know what they're doing financially and conclude affordability within the rules.

Leave it to those who have a clue.
 
Seen summat saying Kane has hired a new PR firm and Charlie taking a back seat in on-going negotiations.
Anyone else seen it?
A twitter post on Spuds forum..

If Charlie is his brother he'd be on a permanent back seat after advising him to sign that six year deal without a cast iron get out clause.
 
You don't hire a PR firm to get a transfer.

You don't hire a PR firm if you're just going to slink back into Spurs training and play for them.


The only reason Harry Kane would need a PR firm would be to rescue or massage his reputation with Tottenham fans when he leaves.
No idea mate,don't know how it works,hence the question.
Just seems strange that Charlie would be taking a back seat in on-going negotiations.....if,of course,that is true.
 
Why would Spurs brief the press about an article criticising Levy? Clear where the article came from, has Charlie's mitts all over it. Entire artciel is basically Kane's camp moaning in the press.....'sources close to the player etc etc'

I think you miscalculate Spurs my friend. We don't need the money, hence why we aren't accepting a derisory 125 million. We have our value and if it isn't met, Kane stays and will probably win the golden boot this season. We don't lose out. You could sign Haaland next summer? For a start that isn't a given anyway, there will be lots of competition for him. Our best chance of CL football is Kane staying and playing upfront with Son. Or we sell him for 160 million and replace hopefully with two quality attackers.

The main issue seems with the whole saga is City are trying to get Kane for a low ball figure. Just 25 million more than Grealish is an insult, Kane's so much more effective and is exactly what City need.
Fuck me how many accounts does levy have on BM!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.