Harry Kane

I'd be worried about KDB's injuries if he was a player we were about to spend £160m on too.

I think his injuries are one of the main reasons we've bought Grealish. We now have another absolutely world class midfielder on the pitch when Kev is not fit and can be more relaxed about his recoveries as he gets into his 30s.
Even with kdb injuries what he provides when he is fit 160m would be a bargain in this market
 
It's hilarious.

/r/soccer has convinced itself that we have unlimited money and zero FFP worries so to them, us haggling over £60m is like a billionaire not wanting to pay 10p for a shopping bag.
that sub is full of uneducated teenagers. Awful awful platform for discussion, used to be okay for goals and highlights, even that's ruined.
 
Yes but if reports are correct we have already bid 100m. That would suggest we are ok with paying 100m (possibly more) on a player that is known to have problems with his knee (and possible ankles). All a bit odd imo.
No the other poster was asked why City have potentially bid £100m (which actually nobody knows for sure), I was merely saying the other poster wouldn’t know why, he was just passing on info in good faith
 
That's not what I'd call looking into his injuries properly.

IMO clearly has a completely fucked ankle. They are only getting more and more frequent, and any kind of contact on his ankles seems to put him out for a minimum of 10 days which suggests to me something is permanently damaged and he's playing through it.

September 2016 Ankle injury.
March 2017 He reinjures the same ankle.
March 2018 Ankle injury again.
January 2019 Ankle injury.
April 2019 Ankle injury.
November 2020 Ankle injury (this is reported as unknown, but it happened after he limped off with after a challenge on his ankle vs. Iceland)
January 2021 Ankle injury.
April 2021 Ankle injury.

Spurs do rely on him, but he's gone through summers like 2019 with no international tournaments and not had a corrective surgery, so it seems unlikely to me that anything can be done to fix it. He's also got a habit of re-injuring it when they think it's fixed (ie being out for 40 days in Jan 2019 then coming back for 2 weeks and missing another 50 days)


I'm sure he'll keep playing through it, but it's not going to get better on its own, in fact these repetitive injuries usually just get worse and worse as a player approaches 30. I do not believe he's going to make it far past 30 at the top level, but....who cares? There will always be world class strikers around and if money is no object we'll get 2 or 3 years out of Kane and fuck him off when he can't produce any more.

I did a comparison a few weeks back and from what I remember, Sergio missed something like five more games than Kane over the last five seasons through injury.

Keeping in mind that the perception of Aguero is that he's injury prone and he's
five years older than Kane, I find it hard to believe some people can't accept others finding Harry's fitness a concern.
 
Silence is golden golden, hmmmm not sure this applies to this deal. Spurs will announce Kane is staying, then we'll say there's no time to get a replacement in. As obvious as night following day
 
I'd be worried about KDB's injuries if he was a player we were about to spend £160m on too.

I think his injuries are one of the main reasons we've bought Grealish. We now have another absolutely world class midfielder on the pitch when Kev is not fit and can be more relaxed about his recoveries as he gets into his 30s.
100% the reason we purchased Grealish - we will need to manage KDB’s playing time if he is going to play out his contract.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.