Harry Kane

[Keeper!]

so much pressure on Nuno to get them top 4 now, otherwise question marks are going to be hanging over Kane again next summer

a year in football is a long time, Kane could be in a very different position this time nest year.

 

[asahartford1]

I'm not sure if he does or doesn't hate City, but the only reason he comes out with this tripe is for clicks and to be 'controversial' so Talksport will continue to employ him.

Despite his verbal diarrhea and nonsensical vebosity he is portrayed as the voice of reason. He embodies the myths and lies accepted as truth by the majority.
Told the great british public we were owned by Saudi Arabia last week

 

[doobyedoobye]

It's bizarre. Nearly everyone has stated that Levy was within his rights to name his price and not budge. Well the converse of that is that we were within our rights not to pay his price.

I'm sure we were acting in good faith with the parameters of the offer but I do think someone in the deal making circle of trust was misinformed

 

[mccity]

Hopefully we are back in for him. Otherwise he will end up at United. His tweet yesterday implies he is staying for this season, and realistically its either City or United. No surprise Levy will bend over for them and sell closer to 100m.

As much as I wouldn't like to see him at United, it beats them getting Haaland..

 

[I'm Blue]

If that contract has a buyout those wages would create another problem cos he’ll then want more than he’s currently on.
Good : )

 

[bluealf]

Hopefully we are back in for him. Otherwise he will end up at United. His tweet yesterday implies he is staying for this season, and realistically its either City or United. No surprise Levy will bend over for them and sell closer to 100m.

We can't just buy players just in case they end up at Utd, the prime examples are Sanchez, Fred and Pogba, I very much doubt Manure got their money's worth out of those three but saved us buying them lol

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

Where have all the "we won't leave him hanging" posts gone? All I see is Kane and Levy taking flak. All transfers involve the buyer discretely finding out if the player will move, once they have his indication they go and find out if the club will sell. This is established practice, Kane did his bit, twice, City let him down. A club the size of City should have known what spurs would take before getting the player to start letting off grenades. They acted either amateurish or naive, if Spurs price was too much the player should have been informed in May. We where told it was "close" less than 2 weeks ago when in reality it was never close. Kane nor his agent have ever been involved I a transfer, the onus was on City to to indicate how well or otherwise things where developing. They either completely misunderstood the situation or just plain had no clue.

I've seen numerous times that players won't sign for Spurs because Levy won't let them go, I'd argue City have come out of this worse. Would the agent of Declan Rice or Kalvin Phillips have their player behave the way Kane did in the knowledge City might just abandon them? You never hear of Liverpool, Chelsea or Utd behaving in such a way, they seem to know if a player is actually attainable before getting involved. City done this Koulibaly last year too. Its poor behaviour.

The way you have twisted the facts to blame City for this saga is absurd. If you are happy as a Spurs fan to be an apologist for Daniel Levy then good luck to you.

 

[Keeper!]

Where have all the "we won't leave him hanging" posts gone? All I see is Kane and Levy taking flak. All transfers involve the buyer discretely finding out if the player will move, once they have his indication they go and find out if the club will sell. This is established practice, Kane did his bit, twice, City let him down. A club the size of City should have known what spurs would take before getting the player to start letting off grenades. They acted either amateurish or naive, if Spurs price was too much the player should have been informed in May. We where told it was "close" less than 2 weeks ago when in reality it was never close. Kane nor his agent have ever been involved I a transfer, the onus was on City to to indicate how well or otherwise things where developing. They either completely misunderstood the situation or just plain had no clue.

I've seen numerous times that players won't sign for Spurs because Levy won't let them go, I'd argue City have come out of this worse. Would the agent of Declan Rice or Kalvin Phillips have their player behave the way Kane did in the knowledge City might just abandon them? You never hear of Liverpool, Chelsea or Utd behaving in such a way, they seem to know if a player is actually attainable before getting involved. City done this Koulibaly last year too. Its poor behaviour.

The only ones to blame for this situation are Kane and his brother.

They were happy to sign that 6 year deal Levy put in front of them, then as soon as Spurs fortunes reverted to type, IE shit, they wanted out because of a "Gentleman's" agreement.

What a joke, and it also shows Kane up in every way, loyal, please your aving a giraffe my son.

 

[IrishBlueSince92]

What was the truth then in the end, some journos saying we bid 150m euros and others saying we only made one bid £75m plus £25m of add ons

 

[bluethrunthru]