Harry Kane

[jrb]

The only plus from the whole saga is the mess Levy has left himself with.

 

[Mancity1980]

He is playing alright for England, I would still buy him at a discount, obviously I would prefer Haaland. We need a striker.

 

[meeesh]

I don't think it's just that.

I think that certainly plays a role, but he doesn't look nearly as quick, he seems to have lost a step, and the ankle injuries have finally caught up to him.

As shit as he's playing,he'd score for us,like today I reckon

 

[deano ou812]

We need a striker but I’m prepared too to stick it out without one rather than bring Kane in,we dodged a bullet with him in my opinion..

 

[Marvin]

Too old.

 

[Lavinda Past]

Too old.

He's good, but a three year signing tops imo. He'll be pretty much done by then and just seeing out whatever was left of his contract.

If I held the purse strings at City, I wouldn't pay more than £70m on a max three year contract, with an option for one more year.

That said, I wouldn't go near him if we could sign Haaland instead. A big offer in January would tempt Dortmund to let him go. We should just do it.

 

[domalino]

He is playing alright for England, I would still buy him at a discount, obviously I would prefer Haaland. We need a striker.

I don't think he's playing well for England, but even if he were, I'd take a disappointing season followed by Haaland arriving on a 6 year deal rather than signing Kane for what would still be 100m+ in January to try and save it.

 

[Craig]

Too old.

Ffs he’s 28

 

[wolviedinho]

This Kane is mentally shot. He would still be a beast in this city team. Unfortunately for him I think that ship has sailed.

 

[TravisBickle]

Ffs he’s 28

Going on 40!