"Unrealistic".
According to who?
A chance to buy a player with a release clause is the most City transfer possible.
The only reason people think it's unrealistic is they've swallowed too much media BS about how much Haaland wants to earn.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
"Unrealistic".
According to who?
A chance to buy a player with a release clause is the most City transfer possible.
The only reason people think it's unrealistic is they've swallowed too much media BS about how much Haaland wants to earn.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
Where is the proof that Pep wanted him?Pep wanted him badly. It feels similar to when we transferred mahrez. We waited and went back to Leicester with a lower more realistic fee.
Kane is obviously not the popular choice with Dusan & Erling seemingly about to come on the market.
A rejuvenated and motivated Kane would be an excellent addition. No mystic but a solid performer.
Vlahovic- gamble.
Kane - safe.
Haaland - unrealistic.
Kane is the obvious city transfer.
I know Pep backs himself as a great manager, but I think even he draws the line at being able to get any value out of Kane.
Pep wanted him badly. It feels similar to when we transferred mahrez. We waited and went back to Leicester with a lower more realistic fee.
Kane is obviously not the popular choice with Dusan & Erling seemingly about to come on the market.
A rejuvenated and motivated Kane would be an excellent addition. No mystic but a solid performer.
Vlahovic- gamble.
Kane - safe.
Haaland - unrealistic.
Kane is the obvious city transfer.
2 goals in 6 months, is anything but safe.
Particularly for a player with no pace approaching his 30s, that is pretty much twice the price of either of the other two.
vicblueman
Well-Known Member
Nooooooooooooooooooooooo!
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
Openly courted kane in the media.Where is the proof that Pep wanted him?
I know Pep backs himself as a great manager, but I think even he draws the line at being able to get any value out of Kane.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
According to City. We don’t go into bidding wars. We box the player off before another club comes knocking. Last summer the club went all in for Kane. The links to both Haaland & Dusan are not concrete. The latter was not even on our radar. Haaland has had plenty of time to decide his next move. He has not once spoken about moving to city. Kane has when he did the interview with sky sports."Unrealistic".
According to who?
A chance to buy a player with a release clause is the most City transfer possible.
The only reason people think it's unrealistic is they've swallowed too much media BS about how much Haaland wants to earn.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
I don’t agree. 5 months ago he was a top player but now he is shit? It don’t work like that in the real world. Kane in January would be a fantastic move and help us wrap up the league and give us a shot at the champions league.2 goals in 6 months, is anything but safe.
Particularly for a player with no pace approaching his 30s, that is pretty much twice the price of either of the other two.
Form is temporary.
According to City. We don’t go into bidding wars. We box the player off before another club comes knocking. Last summer the club went all in for Kane. The links to both Haaland & Dusan are not concrete. The latter was not even on our radar. Haaland has had plenty of time to decide his next move. He has not once spoken about moving to city. Kane has when he did the interview with sky sports.
sorry but everything in that post is nonsense.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
No need to be sorry. The truth is often hard to accept. I would rather have Haaland myself but cannot ignore the moves we have previously made for Kane.sorry but everything in that post is nonsense.