People here tend to underestimate him for some reason. Harry Kane is a world-class striker. In fact the only downside it is his age, that's all. Kane cannot be disqualified because his injuries records because Haaland has been injured quite a bit so far.
Kane has the whole package and he is the perfect striker for us, in my opinion he is much more suited to our style of play than Haaland. When all the teams against us park the bus the pace of Haaland is not much impact. Kane on the other hand knows how to come from behind and deliver a world class passes as a real artist. Make no mistake, I'll be the happiest person in the world to see Halland as a city player, he has the potential to be the best player in the world in the next decade, I just think Kane is better suited.
And despite everything I've said so far, I still think Haaland is a better option because of his age. But If Harry Kane and Haaland are both 21, I really think I would go with Kane.