Conte now officially out of inter and I assume he is going to spurs. Great appointment for them will be interesting to see if he can persuade Kane to stay. Gonna be a very telling few weeks before the euros
Or Madrid
Conte now officially out of inter and I assume he is going to spurs. Great appointment for them will be interesting to see if he can persuade Kane to stay. Gonna be a very telling few weeks before the euros
Haha surely that can’t be true? So spurs want a soft touch basically a yes man rather than a proven winner. Spursy I guess I bloody hope sky are right on this one. Bookies now have conte as fav but then again just this week they have had Rodgers, Ajax manager, Martinez and poch as favourite! Talk about a scatter gun approachAccording to SSN Spurs want a manager that’s nice and cuddly and that’s not Conte.
So reading between the lines - they want a yes man.
It was Kaveh Solhekol so he may well be in a taxi on the way to Spurs already knowing that twat.Haha surely that can’t be true? So spurs want a soft touch basically a yes man rather than a proven winner. Spursy I guess I bloody hope sky are right on this one. Bookies now have conte as fav but then again just this week they have had Rodgers, Ajax manager, Martinez and poch as favourite! Talk about a scatter gun approach
Who gives a fuck?I’m finding all this talk about Kane and £100 million very sad to be honest. One of the plus points about City is that yes, we have spent big money, but we have spent it wisely.
£100 million plus for a 28 year old is not a wise move, and neither is £80 million and a 24 year old Gabriel Jesus as a part-ex deal.
I’d prefer it if we stayed true to our recent strategy, buy good, young players, not an old guy with dodgy ankles who thanks to Covid19 and the Euros in 2 weeks and a World Cup in 2022 might well be burned out by age 30/31.
Can I also add this: wasn’t it great at the weekend to celebrate ten years of the legendary Sergio Aguero? Would we get ten years out of Harry Kane??? No, I doubt we’d get five.
Furthermore, because I know some people may say money’s no barrier to City, but if we spent £100 million plus on a 28 yr old Harry Kane it would just provide ammunition for the haters who say we buy our success. Currently, with our record signing I think being sixty-five million, we can say yes we do spend money, but not silly money (like on Vandervalk or Pogbad) instead we build team spirit and have good coaching and I prefer it to stay like that.
I think there is a very good reason why he is cheaper than Kane :)Lukaku now available apparently, would be cheaper than Kane at 75 million euros
because inter's owners are con-men and have no money.I think there is a very good reason why he is cheaper than Kane :)
Who gives a fuck?
Hodgson.According to SSN Spurs want a manager that’s nice and cuddly and that’s not Conte.
So reading between the lines - they want a yes man.