You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Bobby Heaton Moor
Well-Known Member
Kane would bury chances for us like Kun did in his prime. Probably the best option if Haaland is unattainable.
On a side note, Mourinho having to sell his best player to Pep would be priceless.
On a side note, Mourinho having to sell his best player to Pep would be priceless.
For the way Kane plays, he's definitely not too old, he can play at the top for maybe 10 more years, more than enough time with us to repay his value.
He is a **** though, but if the club wants to buy the best striker in the league this season, whose also english and a playmaker (16G and 13A this season), I can't really fault that logic.
He is a **** though, but if the club wants to buy the best striker in the league this season, whose also english and a playmaker (16G and 13A this season), I can't really fault that logic.
If he could stay fit. You’d just know he’d go down in his first game for us.Would prefer Haaland but Kane would score tons of goals for us
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
At his age, it’s downhill from here in terms of injuries
I agree with everything except the bolded. You might be right but with his injury history it's more likely he'd start having problems sooner rather than later. It's not common for players with persistent injuries like he's had to thrive past their early 30s. It'd be risky to get him on that basis. And to cement the point, the dip can happen fast.For the way Kane plays, he's definitely not too old, he can play at the top for maybe 10 more years, more than enough time with us to repay his value.
He is a **** though, but if the club wants to buy the best striker in the league this season, whose also english and a playmaker (16G and 13A this season), I can't really fault that logic.
However he could still be excellent for 3-4 years fairly risk free. It does make the need to sign him more urgent for whoever decides they want him.
Trojan1962
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 3,027
No sell on value for a player who levy would value at £150 million. Injury prone as well
Yeah that was perhaps a stretch, but I could definitely see atleast 5 years from him.I agree with everything except the bolded. You might be right but with his injury history it's more likely he'd start having problems sooner rather than later. It's not common for players with persistent injuries like he's had to thrive past their early 30s. It'd be risky to get him on that basis. And to cement the point, the dip can happen fast.
However he could still be excellent for 3-4 years fairly risk free. It does make the need to sign him more urgent for whoever decides they want him.