kaz7
Well-Known Member
This isn’t new from this source and no one should believe it for a second, but it still makes me sick to my stomach to even think about it
The express is a comic
This isn’t new from this source and no one should believe it for a second, but it still makes me sick to my stomach to even think about it
FixedKane's a cracking player, don't get me wrong but I feel like Haaland would be a much, much better signing in the long term.
It looks like you've never seen Haaland play at all so I don't really know what there is to discuss.
No one could possibly be so clueless.....i'm going with attention seeking rather than WUMming.But we are guaranteed a world-class striker in Kane, someone that can actually play football
It took over from the Sun,Star and Mirror as having the least accurate transfer rumours a few years back, maybe for click bait.The express is a comic
You want a proper off-the-rails-crazy opinion? Here we go...Kane is an elite striker, but he's an astonishingly bad big game player. If Sterling frustrates you, then you would slit your wrists watching Kane play in a knockout round. He may have the raw numbers because he is still an elite finisher at the end of the day, but he's nothing like Kun. Reminds of that quote - "There are great goalscorers and then there are scorers of great goals. The truly world class players are the ones who are both". I might have pulled that out of my arse.I’d have Kane if Haaland fell through all day long.
I'm sure that is what they sit at home thinking about a lot.Don’t think he’ll leave Spurs. I think clubs will be looking at his age and injuries and decide £100m could be spent better elsewhere
In years to come Kane will look back at his career like Shearer and Le Tissier with a heavy dollop of regret about the moves he never made