Harry Kane

LongsightM13 said:
I think that’s his point. We are the right club for him, the perfect club in fact, but Raiola will chase the money regardless.
Veratti should be a global superstar, one of the best midfielders of his generation, but has instead wasted his time in an inferior league
Click to expand...
So which one is it? Raiola holds players back or Raiola moves players on for a payday.

Veratti is a good player, not Raiola's fault the lad likes playing in a shite league and earning a fortune whilst living in Paris. If Veratti really wanted to test himself he would get Raiola to move him to the prem. He clearly doesnt' want it.

Pogba doesn't want to go anywhere else, he makes a fortune being at the rags and there are no other clubs he would get on the pitch for that are going to pay him any better. Why be arsed moving around.

De Ligt wanted to move to Juve, Raiola got the deal done. Not his fault the team imploded and had a shite manager when he turned up.

At this moment in time there are probably 3 clubs in world football that on paper are top level, great facilities, challenging for trophies and will pay a fortune, Chelsea, City and Bayern. If a player really wants to challenge himself he would sign for any of them teams, Bayern dominate domestically of course but you cannot deny the pressures and ability you have to have to be at Bayern who are always around in the late stages of the CL and are expected to win minimum of 2 trophies a year.

Raiola does what the player wants, if you believe he is the one dictating things then you have fallen for the image that he has built which is exactly why players sign for him.

Want a move or a new contract, Raiola does the dirty work and deflects everything off you, thats worth its weight in gold to any footballer and fair fucks to the guy for pulling the pants down of most clubs around europe for his time and efforts.
 
decmancity said:
So which one is it? Raiola holds players back or Raiola moves players on for a payday.

Veratti is a good player, not Raiola's fault the lad likes playing in a shite league and earning a fortune whilst living in Paris. If Veratti really wanted to test himself he would get Raiola to move him to the prem. He clearly doesnt' want it.

Pogba doesn't want to go anywhere else, he makes a fortune being at the rags and there are no other clubs he would get on the pitch for that are going to pay him any better. Why be arsed moving around.

De Ligt wanted to move to Juve, Raiola got the deal done. Not his fault the team imploded and had a shite manager when he turned up.

At this moment in time there are probably 3 clubs in world football that on paper are top level, great facilities, challenging for trophies and will pay a fortune, Chelsea, City and Bayern. If a player really wants to challenge himself he would sign for any of them teams, Bayern dominate domestically of course but you cannot deny the pressures and ability you have to have to be at Bayern who are always around in the late stages of the CL and are expected to win minimum of 2 trophies a year.

Raiola does what the player wants, if you believe he is the one dictating things then you have fallen for the image that he has built which is exactly why players sign for him.

Want a move or a new contract, Raiola does the dirty work and deflects everything off you, thats worth its weight in gold to any footballer and fair fucks to the guy for pulling the pants down of most clubs around europe for his time and efforts.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure he’s as passive and hands-off as you suggest but as with most things, the truth probably lies somewhere between the two extremes
 
LongsightM13 said:
I’m not sure he’s as passive and hands-off as you suggest but as with most things, the truth probably lies somewhere between the two extremes
Click to expand...
I think he is as passive and hands off as the player (client) wants him to be. As I said, Veratti is seemingly happy at PSG so he has no reason to get involved. Raiola can't just pull him and sell him like hes a used car. He no doubt has a bit more pull with his younger players but ultimately if a lad he represents goes from Sociedad to Inter Milan or something then he can hardly complain, Raiola opens doors that are closed to others.

If a player is agitating for a move then Raiola pulls out the box of tricks or maybe he just gets bored and fucks around sometimes, like with the rags over Pogba for a laugh.
 
decmancity said:
I think he is as passive and hands off as the player (client) wants him to be. As I said, Veratti is seemingly happy at PSG so he has no reason to get involved. Raiola can't just pull him and sell him like hes a used car. He no doubt has a bit more pull with his younger players but ultimately if a lad he represents goes from Sociedad to Inter Milan or something then he can hardly complain, Raiola opens doors that are closed to others.

If a player is agitating for a move then Raiola pulls out the box of tricks or maybe he just gets bored and fucks around sometimes, like with the rags over Pogba for a laugh.
Click to expand...
Raiola has always been the biggest obstacle to anyone signing Haaland. He is always looking for under the table deals for himself. Given our FFP issues we can't afford to do anything underhand and will probably walk away.
The situation with Levy at Spurs is equally difficult. Levy is one of the people who tried to get us banned by signing that poison pen letter. He's toxic and City are not the sort of club which gets taken for a ride any more by people like him.
I think the most likely outcome this summer is a short-term left field signing, perhaps Lukaku or Lewandowski. Which will buy us some time till next summer when Haaland may be out of contract or Delap and Jesus have surprised us all with their huge goal tallies.
 
Cityisland said:
If Haaland is 150mil..Kane is 100mil... 7 years older but still at it. The Torres comparison is bollocks.. he'd lost it before he left Liverpool.

We get 4 good years im ecstatic.
Click to expand...
Except Kane isn’t £100m
According to reports Spurs have already rejected that and still want £150m.
 
Cityisland said:
If Haaland is 150mil..Kane is 100mil... 7 years older but still at it. The Torres comparison is bollocks.. he'd lost it before he left Liverpool.

We get 4 good years im ecstatic.
Click to expand...
I think it would be more like Kane would be 150mill and Haaland 200mill+++ with all of the extras for Alf and Raiola, plus his wages would be probably twice what Kane would accept.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.