grim up north
Well-Known Member
Desperate?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Couldn't care less about Kane - one way or another - just not a fan of your moronic mewlings.so we are not allowed to like a player that play for this club?
I though this was a football forum to discuss signings, it's apperars to be the Arry Kane fan boy site.
It really isn't, one isn't like the other. Kane isn't carrying all this baggage. You can believe what you want to though.
Neither of them are carrying the amount of baggage loaded on them by those that want the other. Both carry some baggage.
Last edited:
I would think the Haaland deal would be a lot more than 130m in total, probably 200m plus with what Haaland Snr and Rialoa would want in fees.
I think it could be a billion. No fuck it, 5 billion. Let's just keep growing.it see if we can get to claiming 200 billion!
Gingers Dad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 7,058
Really? Strikes me as a bit of a one trick pony. Seems like they've replaced Mourinho with a less successful version of MourinhoI actually thought Nuno was a good appointment, for the 10th call. I can see him doing well.
If you think about it the fact that some people find Kane boring and dull would make him a classic City signing. We rarely buy a player who is a 'character' two that come to mind are Mario and Mendy maybe a few others but on the whole we tend to buy players like Kane who cause no drama.
blue ranger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 2,725
If we are going to pay 130m then we should get Haaland instead for that kind of money
Think you are missing the point. Pep wants Kane not Haaland.
balotellishaircut
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 6,500
- Team supported
- City
At least we’ve learnt something today, you couldn’t give a shit whether we sign Kane or not, that’s nice to know from an ingenious poster such as yourself..Couldn't care less about Kane - one way or another - just not a fan of your moronic mewlings.
It’s funny when people mention £130m+ for Kane, you see comments like “just pay it, not my money”The only issue there is Haaland would require about 200m and that's without agent fee, his dad wanting a separate cut, his wage demands (about 500k per week) and a release clause inserted in his deal, with rumours of him moving every summer, all media drama aside. We're good not pursuing him.
Yet when it comes to Haaland it’s “but he wants £500k a week, agents fees”
Pay whatever it takes to get the best available for the long term, that’s Haaland.
You're another of the clueless c***s polluting the forums.At least we’ve learnt something today, you couldn’t give a shit whether we sign Kane or not, that’s nice to know from an ingenious poster such as yourself..