Conte now officially out of inter and I assume he is going to spurs. Great appointment for them will be interesting to see if he can persuade Kane to stay. Gonna be a very telling few weeks before the euros
Or Madrid
Conte now officially out of inter and I assume he is going to spurs. Great appointment for them will be interesting to see if he can persuade Kane to stay. Gonna be a very telling few weeks before the euros
Haha surely that can’t be true? So spurs want a soft touch basically a yes man rather than a proven winner. Spursy I guess I bloody hope sky are right on this one. Bookies now have conte as fav but then again just this week they have had Rodgers, Ajax manager, Martinez and poch as favourite! Talk about a scatter gun approachAccording to SSN Spurs want a manager that’s nice and cuddly and that’s not Conte.
So reading between the lines - they want a yes man.
It was Kaveh Solhekol so he may well be in a taxi on the way to Spurs already knowing that twat.Haha surely that can’t be true? So spurs want a soft touch basically a yes man rather than a proven winner. Spursy I guess I bloody hope sky are right on this one. Bookies now have conte as fav but then again just this week they have had Rodgers, Ajax manager, Martinez and poch as favourite! Talk about a scatter gun approach
Who gives a fuck?I’m finding all this talk about Kane and £100 million very sad to be honest. One of the plus points about City is that yes, we have spent big money, but we have spent it wisely.
£100 million plus for a 28 year old is not a wise move, and neither is £80 million and a 24 year old Gabriel Jesus as a part-ex deal.
I’d prefer it if we stayed true to our recent strategy, buy good, young players, not an old guy with dodgy ankles who thanks to Covid19 and the Euros in 2 weeks and a World Cup in 2022 might well be burned out by age 30/31.
Can I also add this: wasn’t it great at the weekend to celebrate ten years of the legendary Sergio Aguero? Would we get ten years out of Harry Kane??? No, I doubt we’d get five.
Furthermore, because I know some people may say money’s no barrier to City, but if we spent £100 million plus on a 28 yr old Harry Kane it would just provide ammunition for the haters who say we buy our success. Currently, with our record signing I think being sixty-five million, we can say yes we do spend money, but not silly money (like on Vandervalk or Pogbad) instead we build team spirit and have good coaching and I prefer it to stay like that.
I think there is a very good reason why he is cheaper than Kane :)Lukaku now available apparently, would be cheaper than Kane at 75 million euros
because inter's owners are con-men and have no money.I think there is a very good reason why he is cheaper than Kane :)
Who gives a fuck?
Hodgson.According to SSN Spurs want a manager that’s nice and cuddly and that’s not Conte.
So reading between the lines - they want a yes man.
Well I do actually, because not only would Spurs want like twice our biggest spend so far, Kane would want stupid wages too.
What if he gets injured, or doesn't score in August (which he never used to do) and his appointment causes trouble the amongst the team as he is suddenly the highest earner but not pulling his weight and then everything falls apart....
I just don't fancy to risk that for I say again a 28 year old.
he was pretty average in the PL imo.I think there is a very good reason why he is cheaper than Kane :)
it will be someone on the cheap who will be happy with no money to spend and a target of fourth place. Spurs arnt really in the hunt for anything more with their tight fisted Billionaire owner and Levy in charge.According to SSN Spurs want a manager that’s nice and cuddly and that’s not Conte.
So reading between the lines - they want a yes man.
I think there is a very good reason why he is cheaper than Kane :)
They are getting nowhere near fourth if they don’t spend any money, even if Kane stays.it will be someone on the cheap who will be happy with no money to spend and a target of fourth place. Spurs arnt really in the hunt for anything more with their tight fisted Billionaire owner and Levy in charge.
He’s always done well at average teams, and he’s been great for Inter. Plays with KDB as well. With our service, he’d dominate. Plus it’d be hilarious watching another United player winning elsewhere.You’re judging him from his time at United, he hated it there, says he wanted to leave by the second day! But he’s a better player than that, scores from 1 in 3 shots (same as Kane) even while at United but he never got any decent service there.
Plays well with KDB in the Belgian national side and KDB has apparently suggested that City should get him.
I’m not clamouring for him, because I don’t know how we’d accommodate a player like him in our system, but he’s a goal machine if used correctly and I certainly wouldn’t be disappointed if we got him.
If Pep thinks he can get a tune out of him then then I’d like to see it done.
Well I do actually, because not only would Spurs want like twice our biggest spend so far, Kane would want stupid wages too.
What if he gets injured, or doesn't score in August (which he never used to do) and his appointment causes trouble the amongst the team as he is suddenly the highest earner but not pulling his weight and then everything falls apart....
I just don't fancy to risk that for I say again a 28 year old.
Arise, Sir Daniel of IngsWhomever is the backup option to Haaland/Kane that is who we should buy.
It has worked out great so far ;)