Exactly, Haaland is the case of new toy syndrome and whilst Kane is English and has been around for a while so hes deemed underwhelming even though he has been scoring for fun for crap Spurs team and third player in history to win both Golden Boot and playmaker award. (this also doesnt exactly support the argument that hes injury prone, well because he clearly isnt).lol people here hoping we don't sign one of the best strikers in the world are gonna get their wishes when we sign Danny Ings
Just can't for the life of me understand the arrogance of thinking we're too good for, again, the current top goalscorer and top assists in the league that has achieved that for a team that finished 2nd, and also thinking that you know better because you watched a dreadful england side for 2 hours (and ignoring the fact that our players looked just as bad in that team).
Future balon dor winner? Is he really......how many thousands have you put on that at Paddy Power?
Your post sounds like you haven't.....as your not old enough.
Seeing as Raiola isn’t even his agent I’d suggest it’s probably not that.You just have to accept the fact that City won't touch Raiola with barge pole.
This was obvious from the start but people here seem to have convinced themselves otherwise.
City last dealt with Raiola 11 years ago with Balotelli signing, so the chances of dealing with Raiola were extremely slim.
You just have to accept the fact that City won't touch Raiola with barge pole.
This was obvious from the start but people here seem to have convinced themselves otherwise.
City last dealt with Raiola 11 years ago with Balotelli signing, so the chances of dealing with Raiola were extremely slim.
lol people here hoping we don't sign one of the best strikers in the world are gonna get their wishes when we sign Danny Ings
Just can't for the life of me understand the arrogance of thinking we're too good for, again, the current top goalscorer and top assists in the league that has achieved that for a team that finished 7th under Jose bloody Mourinho, and also thinking that you know better because you watched a dreadful england side for 2 hours (and ignoring the fact that our players looked just as bad in that team).
I hope he continues to play shizer for England. Could then offer Levy a reasonable take if or leave it offer
He might be bigger than Kane commercially, but honest question, is that enough? I mean to me the only 2 players that move the needle IMO is Messi and maybe Ronaldo. They still have a big following in places like Asia, South America and North America amongst other countries. Zlatan for example didn't even get noticed walking around LA and he played there. He asked random people on the street "do you know who I am?" and most said no. Haaland might be big in Nordic countries, but is that enough? Will he have a big enough following around the world?Sure, but as a City fan, I want the best for the club and it feels like cutting our noses off inspite of our faces.
This isn't a Dias and Koulibaly situation. Kane is such a risky signing and will never have a connection with the fanbase; he will always be Mr. Tottenham playing in Sky Blue.
Haaland is a commercial powerhouse, a player whose impact on the trajectory of a club is far bigger than Kane.