LesBleuMiserable
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2011
- Messages
- 3,245
Knowing Levy he will go out and buy 10 players with that.£25m? Don't spend it all at once.
Knowing Levy he will go out and buy 10 players with that.£25m? Don't spend it all at once.
100 penalties next season for the Rags if he joins Bruno TomDaly and Submarine RashfordJust read 4 or 5 pages and this is only post with any sense.
Kane is the best striker in the country comfortably. Scores the most, creates the most.
Be interesting to read the opinions of those who don't want him if he signs for scum or Chelsea and gets 40+ goals next season.
I think we already discussed this, but the answer is yes. I have visited many countries in South America in the past few years and I see PSG shirts everywhere. There were almost none before. Their presence in Asia massively increased. The brand exploded with Neymar and Mbappe. It wasn’t a club the casual viewer cared about and now it’s one of the most. Even the non-viewers now perceive the brand in a different way. Looking at the US as a barometer for anything football related is tricky, as you might imagine.He might be bigger than Kane commercially, but honest question, is that enough? I mean to me the only 2 players that move the needle IMO is Messi and maybe Ronaldo. They still have a big following in places like Asia, South America and North America amongst other countries. Zlatan for example didn't even get noticed walking around LA and he played there. He asked random people on the street "do you know who I am?" and most said no. Haaland might be big in Nordic countries, but is that enough? Will he have a big enough following around the world?
If you look at the next 2 big so called starts in Neymar and Mbappe, I'm not sure they even move the needle that much. Does anyone not interested in PSG suddenly watch them every week? I know I don't. I don't think it helped them that much considering they have to buy players like Danilo, Herrera taking a loan player in Florenzi and now take Wijnaldum on a free even though he's a decent player.
You know people that know people at city ?All playing out perfectly.
As expected we get the definitive brief from Levy of Harry is not for sale over tonight and the next day or so.
Next will be Harry hands in transfer request.
Then deal announced.
Isn’t this the same with all transfers, regardless of world class or not ?For me the question is can we manage to land a world class number 9 this window? Unfortunately the deal isn’t done in a vacuum so the debate who is the better player is only a small part of the story.
Who wants to join?
Will the club sell within an appropriate timescale?
Who will accept a salary within our structure?
What are the fees involved?
LolIsn’t this the same with all transfers, regardless of world class or not ?
If we didn't sign another striker , that would be awful planning on our part. That would leave us with Jesus, someone hardly renowned for his consistency of scoring goals. The false nine will be ok in some games, but won't work in others. Failure to land a striker won't make us champions again next seasonFor me the question is can we manage to land a world class number 9 this window? Unfortunately the deal isn’t done in a vacuum so the debate who is the better player is only a small part of the story.
Who wants to join?
Will the club sell within an appropriate timescale?
Who will accept a salary within our structure?
What are the fees involved?
Whether you want Kane at City or not, judging him or any other player by their performances in the Euros whilst being managed by Gareth fucking Southgate is really rather foolish.