Harry Kane

Gorton_Tubster said:
So if we don't buy a striker we won't win the league because everyone has learnt the secret way Chelsea beat City and will adopt the same tactics? OK. Fair enough.
Click to expand...
There are no certainties, of course, but we will need something new, yes.
A striker would be an alternative to how we played last season.
Gives the opposition something new to worry about.
 
For me you pay £150m for Haaland and £30m to his scumbag agent yeah. 2/3 years he wants out to Madrid. We still get at least £100m + in transfer fees if I'm being conservative.
Pay £130/150m for Kane and in 3/4 years we have getting fuck all. Let's assume they are both on 300k a week
 
give it to gordon said:
I voted no to start and to be honest I still havent changed my mind.

If anything watching at the euros has made me even more convinced he isn't suited to City.

Falls over far to easily as does Grealish.

I will admit I have only really seen him play against City and for England. So perhaps I havent seen enough of him.

But from watching him play for England I would be very nervous about City spending really big money on him. He seems slow, a big turning circle, just dont see him suiting oir style
Click to expand...

If your worried about players not going down…. Here’s our target….3BAF446B-0DFC-414E-881E-CACBEF31A9CD.jpeg
 
bobmcfc said:
For me you pay £150m for Haaland and £30m to his scumbag agent yeah. 2/3 years he wants out to Madrid. We still get at least £100m + in transfer fees if I'm being conservative.
Pay £130/150m for Kane and in 3/4 years we have getting fuck all. Let's assume they are both on 300k a week
Click to expand...

The Haaland are rumoured to be wanting £450,000 a week.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.