Harry Kane

Point is if we sign Kane this season we won't be in for Halaand next, and he should be priority.
If we're paying £160m for Harry Kane, you can bet that Haaland will be valued well in excess of £200m as and when he actually becomes available.
Haaland won't be worth anywhere near that imo, but however much is agreed in the Kane deal will set the benchmark for the future.
We won't sign Haaland. If he wanted to come to City, he'd have been signed weeks ago
 
I should be excited about a £160 million player shouldn't I? Just do not see how he fits into our side at all, all of his best traits don't fit into our game very well. And that's before the realisation this means we won't be signing Haaland sinks in. Look forward to Pep hopefully proving me wrong.
He'll fit in nicely and score an absolute bagful in our team so not concerned about the job he'll do for us it's not like he's gerry creaney
but 160m is absolutely fuckin bonkers must be including a fee for Jesus going the opposite direction, if its all money then someone at the club needs their fuckin bumps feeling!
 
I think is moreover the fact that this is someone who has no ties to Spurs let alone football, and this is a massive story that is essentially claiming it's done, I think people are thinking that if it's true you would think Spurs would've given this to a very loyal ally in the media and not some showbiz reporter.
I doubt the deal is actually done yet, but if Levy has told Kane that he’s willing to negotiate then I think it’s a matter of when and not if. Probably be more twists and turns ahead, but it certainly feels like the wheels are in motion.
 
I doubt the deal is actually done yet, but if Levy has told Kane that he’s willing to negotiate then I think it’s a matter of when and not if. Probably be more twists and turns ahead, but it certainly feels like the wheels are in motion.

This has come from Kanes side either to put pressure on Levy or Kanes brother wants to be the one to break the story.
 
He contributed next to nothing for England besides his goals.

And he scored less than a player that played 3 less games than him. Do you think finishing with 4 goals is an achievement for a player of his supposed quality?

Are we talking about Danny Ings here or a player that people expect to potentially be the difference in winning the Champions League?
At a return of 4 in 7 that equates to roughly 35 goals a season.

I don't think that's too bad considering you would assume given his relatively poor performances in the Euros that return would be higher in an attacking team
 
160m probably includes if he wins stuff including awards, the sandwiches on his first day, the phone call to his brother plus vat.
They are still quoting 89m for pogbad even though the ex Juve chaiman recently said it was about 140m euros.
 
Last edited:
No not claiming to be a fly on the wall but at least someone else on here fully understands the transfer strategy and how it operates unlike yourself.I was also told by an old City player some time ago about the ways in which we operate as a club for transfers and seeing this player was very much respected around City and I do not doubt the information he told me to either be a lie nor fantasy.
Haaland appears to be going nowhere this coming season so why fuck about for another 12 months playing without a decent recognised striker.For all we know City may have fuck you to Haaland, his Dad and his shithead Agent.It wont be the first or last time that we`ve walked away from a big money signing.
By a million miles Kane is the best about within the PL who has a wonderful track record and I for one will welcome him on board should it happen.

Oh right so you fully understand precisely how the club operate on transfers because you once had a word with an old City player, and the rest of us are clueless for thinking Txiki has a role in the fees parted with for his targets?

Funny stuff.

I hope Kane is a roaring success if we sign him too btw, how could any blue not? I just have reservations about the move, that's all.

I hope I am wrong if he does sign. I had reservations about the Dias move initially, and I was delighted to be proven wrong on that. Hopefully I am wrong in this instance if Kane does sign.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.