#leak
I’ve read some spurs fans saying the worry is Kane could buy himself out of the final 3 years of his contract. Due to his age and already having 2 years of said contract under his belt.
I don’t think it’s ever been done before, but I suppose it depends how much Kane wants to win trophies.
It’s the Webster ruling, was a verdict given down by CAS. Not many instances of it happening since the initial verdict.thats interesting and one of those Bosman things that’s been around for a while but not aware it being used. Kane must be on about £200k a week at Spuds so guess he could buy out his contract for about thirty million quid then get that back from City plus the same again as a signing on fee. Then pick up Aguero’s place on the wage bill costing us about £60m instead of the quoted £150m. Spuds won’t sell him to Chelsea and Kane isn’t daft enough to join the trophy dodgers with rats in the kitchen and a leaky roof.
I think there is a bit of an unwritten law between players and clubs that this could throw football as we know it into chaos. As such it hasn't really taken off in any significant way.It’s the Webster ruling, was a verdict given down by CAS. Not many instances of it happening since the initial verdict.
Maybe so, but if Levy acts like a khunt then the player has always got this up his sleeveI think there is a bit of an unwritten law between players and clubs that this could throw football as we know it into chaos. As such it hasn't really taken off in any significant way.
You think Lautaro Martínez is a fancier name than Romelu
Levy has been awfully quiet about this potential transfer, was expecting spurs to be leaking way more stuff out about their demands etc. Maybe that's still to come.Maybe so, but if Levy acts like a khunt then the player has always got this up his sleeve
Maybe thats why he was quoted recently as saying "Spurs can't stop him leaving"