It can’t include wages mate, he will be on circa £20mil a year, and I’d be astonished if he didn’t get a 5 year deal. Do the maths.Does if it includes wages
For me Kane is a bottler who goes missing in the big games… Not sure why Pep can’t see that or is his ego so big that he thinks he can fix it?
Did some numbers. Looks like 72.5m wages before bonuses. That kinda makes it lower than 160m. Should be closer to 180?Does if it includes wages
I doubt we'll get him for any less than £100M, but we are taking a risk that a 28 year old player will just drop into the team, start banging the goals in and hitting high numbers. He might, but he might not. If we're really lucky we'll get one season at best of peak Kane, and I just don't think he's worth it.You think we can get Kane for less than £65 mil? Bloody hell mate the top scorer and assist maker in the league last season isn’t going to come cheap
You are on the wind up. Imagine describing signing one of the most prolific strikers in the world as 'a dark day'Kane is one player I just can’t take to…. if this news is compounded by Haaland going to the Chavs then (for me) it’s a dark day indeed
Kane is a bottler who had the highest goals and assists in the league last season in a team which qualified for Europa. I dont mind Foden, KDB picking up the goals in the big games if Kane is doing 30+ for us.Gutted if the news is true about Kane… If Haaland goes to Chelsea I think we’ve fucked up big time
If the price being reported is anywhere close to the truth then we’ve been well and truly bent over by Levy.. I thought we were smarter than that
For me Kane is a bottler who goes missing in the big games… Not sure why Pep can’t see that or is his ego so big that he thinks he can fix it?
This is Haaland we’re talking about .. the same Haaland who wore a City shirt as a kid and who’s Dad played for the club… The lad wants to come alright but we don’t seem to want to bite the bullet and pay the agent’s fee… Very reminiscent of the Hazard situationWhat do you mean, we've fucked up big time? Just because we might want a player it doesn't mean it's reciprocated. You can't have something that isn't available, and if Haaland doesn't want to come here then he isn't available. That is not fucking up. You can't fuck up on something that isn't there in the first place.
I'm not going to argue with you because I'm buzzing. Feel free to continue expressing your opinion however you see fit and I'll do the same. You're one of my favourite posters on here so I apologise if you felt my initial post was a dig at you!
Each to his own…. Just don’t think he’s got what it takes in big games…You are on the wind up. Imagine describing signing one of the most prolific strikers in the world as 'a dark day'
Don't be so naive.This is Haaland we’re talking about .. the same Haaland who wore a City shirt as a kid and who’s Dad played for the club… The lad wants to come alright but we don’t seem to want to bite the bullet and pay the agent’s fee… Very reminiscent of the Hazard situation
I voted no and even I think that’s harsh! Let’s assume 120m before wages and agent fees….even at that it’s a solid deal for us long term in this inflation looming world.I doubt we'll get him for any less than £100M, but we are taking a risk that a 28 year old player will just drop into the team, start banging the goals in and hitting high numbers. He might, but he might not. If we're really lucky we'll get one season at best of peak Kane, and I just don't think he's worth it.
Which big games has he turned up in?? None that I’ve seenAlternatively, Pep thinks that's a load of shite.
I hope it all pans out beautifully… But I’d have preferred Haaland…Don't be so naive.
I feel the same… Kane doesn’t excite me at allCan’t get excited over this at all. Is there something wrong with me. I wake up to read that this is on and my first reaction isn’t one of excitement even though we are about to shell out on one of the greatest premier league forwards.
Maybe I’m a bit clouded as I was all on for Haaland but I hope he is a hit here and does well.
Personally think this is crazy. The problem is that the pool of players available to replace prime Kun is small.I doubt we'll get him for any less than £100M, but we are taking a risk that a 28 year old player will just drop into the team, start banging the goals in and hitting high numbers. He might, but he might not. If we're really lucky we'll get one season at best of peak Kane, and I just don't think he's worth it.