Oh you are about to get lynched mate. Guaranteed 40 goals a season. For fun might I add. Wins us the league, champions league too, smashes shearers record and plays till he's 40. Best in the league and the world.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Oh you are about to get lynched mate. Guaranteed 40 goals a season. For fun might I add. Wins us the league, champions league too, smashes shearers record and plays till he's 40. Best in the league and the world.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Considering Son has just signed a new 4 year deal I can only presume that they can't tell the difference between Son and Kane. Perhaps they think all Spurs players look the same?According to the Telehraph.
Spurs set sights on Dusan Vlahovic (Fiorentina) as club look for new striker to support Harry Kane
Also signed Bryan Gil and are after another winger, add the defenders to that. Their only sale has been Alderweireld for £13m. Spend planned upwards of £100m planned. Not sure how they can without more sales, with their situation, and model.Considering Son has just signed a new 4 year deal I can only presume that they can't tell the difference between Son and Kane. Perhaps they think all Spurs players look the same?
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
Also signed Bryan Gil and are after another winger, add the defenders to that. Their only sale has been Alderweireld for £13m. Spend planned upwards of £100m planned. Not sure how they can without more sales, with their situation, and model.
I think we're passed the point where the question is "will Levy sell Kane" and we're now at "how much will Levy get for Kane and who will they buy with the money".
I've actually heard some stories about their pursuit for a striker. And it pretty much lines up with how it is playing out for Kane to move.I think we're passed the point where the question is "will Levy sell Kane" and we're now at "how much will Levy get for Kane and who will they buy with the money".
I think we're passed the point where the question is "will Levy sell Kane" and we're now at "how much will Levy get for Kane and who will they buy with the money".
Want there are report that we had 225m to spend on Grealish and Kane? So that’s around 90/95m on Grealish rest to play with to get Kane! For me we have them both..
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
For me we have them both..
I feel like that too. Nothing is ever done until it's done, but it has been a while since I've been this confident about City landing their top targets.
Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
Jude Bellingham was way more of a threat and we're not in for him,
He's too old by now ;-)
It's weird how some people on here are setting up a straw man by saying that those who are in favour of getting them are raving about Kane and Grealish. We're not. I see very little evidence of anyone doing that. What I see is people recognising that they're both bloody good footballers who would be a welcome addition to the team. What I also see is that there's nobody else around — certainly not English — who begins to approach their level and who isn't already wearing sky blue.
The price tag is another question. But since nobody on here has solid information as to what that will be, that there are simply rumours flying around, objecting to that or agreeing with it is founded on the purest speculation. Which is ok. It's what happens on a forum. But it is only that.
BlueMoonRisin’
Well-Known Member
I'd walk away now and leave Levy up shit creek without a paddle. He's taking the piss out of us in what he wants for Kane. We have to make a stance and this situation is a good example that we won't cave in to clubs demands when we come knocking.Also signed Bryan Gil and are after another winger, add the defenders to that. Their only sale has been Alderweireld for £13m. Spend planned upwards of £100m planned. Not sure how they can without more sales, with their situation, and model.
I've had a couple 'ITK' claims from a Spurs source. Maybe in line with what some may have heard. Summary of their claim:
Vlahovic shouts started around end of season, right when it became evident Kane wants gone. Spurs would have already had him, had Gattuso's appointment been finalised (you may recall that drama and also other issues with his appointment at Fiorentina only lasting 2 weeks and then at Spurs not going through). That was his guy, Paratici couldn't do that so in comes Nuno, and now they're wanting to pursue Vlahovic again, he was told he'd be the main guy and priority along with Gattuso. Vlahovic wants out of Fiorentina and his condition was he wants to work under Gattuso, now it's different, and Fiorentina are playing hardball over fee, around €60m. The brief from club is however any striker brought in will be to 'support Kane', some link Danny Ings as another one, obviously the smarter move, they want very little damage for when Kane leaves by showing off new signees.
In short, Spurs want a guy in before Kane is let go. The cash they get from us for Kane helps them offsets some immediate costs and get smaller deals across the line, they will obviously pay in installments over whomever they can get, so that's not an issue, just a matter of getting the right player.
imo, it would take a lot for this move to actually not go through rather than nothing happening and him staying. Obviously, as others have said, theres hurdles and U-turns, moves don't go through sometimes. These claims don't sound too wild for me, only hurdle would be if Levy decides to not go through on some of these planned signings, hold Kane against his will, and go into next season hoping for a top 4 finish, get some loan deals across the line. But I assume even he isn't that stupid (yet again, you never know).
Vlahovic shouts started around end of season, right when it became evident Kane wants gone. Spurs would have already had him, had Gattuso's appointment been finalised (you may recall that drama and also other issues with his appointment at Fiorentina only lasting 2 weeks and then at Spurs not going through). That was his guy, Paratici couldn't do that so in comes Nuno, and now they're wanting to pursue Vlahovic again, he was told he'd be the main guy and priority along with Gattuso. Vlahovic wants out of Fiorentina and his condition was he wants to work under Gattuso, now it's different, and Fiorentina are playing hardball over fee, around €60m. The brief from club is however any striker brought in will be to 'support Kane', some link Danny Ings as another one, obviously the smarter move, they want very little damage for when Kane leaves by showing off new signees.
In short, Spurs want a guy in before Kane is let go. The cash they get from us for Kane helps them offsets some immediate costs and get smaller deals across the line, they will obviously pay in installments over whomever they can get, so that's not an issue, just a matter of getting the right player.
imo, it would take a lot for this move to actually not go through rather than nothing happening and him staying. Obviously, as others have said, theres hurdles and U-turns, moves don't go through sometimes. These claims don't sound too wild for me, only hurdle would be if Levy decides to not go through on some of these planned signings, hold Kane against his will, and go into next season hoping for a top 4 finish, get some loan deals across the line. But I assume even he isn't that stupid (yet again, you never know).
Bluesince88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2021
- Messages
- 980
- Team supported
- City
Are you still fucking here. Fuck offOh you are about to get lynched mate. Guaranteed 40 goals a season. For fun might I add. Wins us the league, champions league too, smashes shearers record and plays till he's 40. Best in the league and the world.
Vlahovic looks like he's extending his contract,with a 70m release clause added to it.I've had a couple 'ITK' claims from a Spurs source. Maybe in line with what some may have heard. Summary of their claim:
Vlahovic shouts started around end of season, right when it became evident Kane wants gone. Spurs would have already had him, had Gattuso's appointment been finalised (you may recall that drama and also other issues with his appointment at Fiorentina only lasting 2 weeks and then at Spurs not going through). That was his guy, Paratici couldn't do that so in comes Nuno, and now they're wanting to pursue Vlahovic again, he was told he'd be the main guy and priority along with Gattuso. Vlahovic wants out of Fiorentina and his condition was he wants to work under Gattuso, now it's different, and Fiorentina are playing hardball over fee, around €60m. The brief from club is however any striker brought in will be to 'support Kane', some link Danny Ings as another one, obviously the smarter move, they want very little damage for when Kane leaves by showing off new signees.
In short, Spurs want a guy in before Kane is let go. The cash they get from us for Kane helps them offsets some immediate costs and get smaller deals across the line, they will obviously pay in installments over whomever they can get, so that's not an issue, just a matter of getting the right player.
imo, it would take a lot for this move to actually not go through rather than nothing happening and him staying. Obviously, as others have said, theres hurdles and U-turns, moves don't go through sometimes. These claims don't sound too wild for me, only hurdle would be if Levy decides to not go through on some of these planned signings, hold Kane against his will, and go into next season hoping for a top 4 finish, get some loan deals across the line. But I assume even he isn't that stupid (yet again, you never know).
IlWould make it easier to pay his clause and buy him out tbf. Let's see. Ings to them is an interesting shout as well.Vlahovic looks like he's extending his contract,with a 70m release clause added to it.
Its summat to do with the agents fee,if someone pays the release clause.IlWould make it easier to pay his clause and buy him out tbf. Let's see. Ings to them is an interesting shout as well.
Clause apparently going into new contract.
I'd walk away now and leave Levy up shit creek without a paddle. He's taking the piss out of us in what he wants for Kane. We have to make a stance and this situation is a good example that we won't cave in to clubs demands when we come knocking.
So spurs money wise don’t look good levy let’s the purse strings of and looks like spurs are going to spend around 100m for that says the the deal fee for Kane is about done! Levy can’t take the chance that we would pull out if he asks for to much! 125m plus addons of 10/15m my reckoning..
Oh you are about to get lynched mate. Guaranteed 40 goals a season. For fun might I add. Wins us the league, champions league too, smashes shearers record and plays till he's 40. Best in the league and the world.
To be fair, you’ve exaggerated the comments because you don’t like Kane but the bottom line is, he’s a prolific striker and will score shit loads in any team that creates chances. Like us.
Ethan23
Well-Known Member
Didn't realise he's 4/11 to join us and 11/10 to stay at Spurs.
Hopefully we see something tangible next week - Would love to see him start against Norwich
Hopefully we see something tangible next week - Would love to see him start against Norwich
The goals and winning those trophies wouldn’t be a surprise in our team. If he plays 30 league games I bet he bags 30 league goals.To be fair, you’ve exaggerated the comments because you don’t like Kane but the bottom line is, he’s a prolific striker and will score shit loads in any team that creates chances. Like us.
Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
Didn't realise he's 4/11 to join us and 11/10 to stay at Spurs.
Hopefully we see something tangible next week - Would love to see him start against Norwich
Not being a betting man (and generally being a moron for all things to do with figures), could you explain whether the bookies think it is likelier that he will stay or go? Ta. The way I read those figures I understand it to mean that there's a substantially better chance of him staying at Spurs — but I'm probably wrong.