Harry Kane

[abu13]

The SALT from Spurs fans is starting to raise calling for a transfer ban for us saying it’s disgusting that we are paying 200 odd million on players

Funny how the RAGS can spend over £100 million on Sancho and Varane without selling any players and it is portrayed as being ambitious but us spending £200 million while bringing in around £100 million in sales is unacceptable. Especially when you factor in the Prize money received by each club last season and the comparative levels of debt.

 

[Irlamblue]

i hope one day.. we start to charge people for admission.. charge people for merchandise.. charge for corporate.. charge for sponsorship..etc..... instead of relying on donations from filthy oil money..
anyway.
we didnt start this.
we didnt sell ourselves on the stock exchange in the 90s to generate money..
this self made cash
this self generated wealth
this Narcissitic selfish dictatotship.....

yes we got a leg up financially... but .. it was needed..

 

[JimB]

I believe their debt repayments are £40m a year for at least 23 years. Good luck to them with that. 60 years since they won the league. Horrible club, horrible chairman, horrible fans

It’s actually nearer to £25m per annum. And that isn’t much at all in the context of increased revenues of more than £100m per annum as a consequence of the new stadium.

Spurs’ problem isn’t financial - at least, no more so than any other club during / post pandemic. The problem has been awful decision making on the football side of things over the past 3-4 years. That’s why Kane wants to leave.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

It’s actually nearer to £25m per annum. And that isn’t much at all in the context of increased revenues of more than £100m per annum as a consequence of the new stadium.

Spurs’ problem isn’t financial - at least, no more so than any other club during / post pandemic. The problem has been awful decision making on the football side of things over the past 3-4 years. That’s why Kane wants to leave.

It could be an opportune time for you to sell Kane if you are needing an overhaul. Most transfers at the moment are lower than you’d expect players to go for. Get a decent wedge for Kane and get 4-5 players in areas you need.

 

[JimB]

It could be an opportune time for you to sell Kane if you are needing an overhaul. Most transfers at the moment are lower than you’d expect players to go for. Get a decent wedge for Kane and get 4-5 players in areas you need.

Yep, I’ve come round to that way of thinking too. So long as Spurs get c. £150m.

Until recently, though, I would have had no confidence in Spurs spending that money well. But the new Director of Football (or whatever his title is), Fabio Paratici, seems to be going for the right players in the right positions - something we haven’t done in a while. So I’m cautiously optimistic that we would spend the possible Kane money better than we spent the Bale money.

 

[lasereyes]

It’s actually nearer to £25m per annum. And that isn’t much at all in the context of increased revenues of more than £100m per annum as a consequence of the new stadium.

Spurs’ problem isn’t financial - at least, no more so than any other club during / post pandemic. The problem has been awful decision making on the football side of things over the past 3-4 years. That’s why Kane wants to leave.

Your total debt is almost 1.2B - more even than Barcelona. There is no way your annual debt service is just 25m.

Tottenham Hotspur Stadium leaves Daniel Levy and Spurs with huge debts

The construction of Tottenham Hotspur Stadium has come at a huge cost to the club

www.football.london

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Yep, I’ve come round to that way of thinking too. So long as Spurs get c. £150m.

Until recently, though, I would have had no confidence in Spurs spending that money well. But the new Director of Football (or whatever his title is), Fabio Paratici, seems to be going for the right players in the right positions - something we haven’t done in a while. So I’m cautiously optimistic that we would spend the possible Kane money better than we spent the Bale money.

There’s definitely the opportunity to do so.

There is a dearth of number 9s though. You’d be looking at Ings etc as a temporary replacement.

Nuno might be able to work with amended again though if he has some promising younger players.

I‘ve no idea what the fee would be for Kane. The more north of £100m, the more uncomfortable I get.

 

[Ric]

I‘ve no idea what the fee would be for Kane. The more north of £100m, the more uncomfortable I get.

Can see it being done for around £120m plus add-ons.

 

[eyalluvitt]

The SALT from Spurs fans is starting to raise calling for a transfer ban for us saying it’s disgusting that we are paying 200 odd million on players

Remember being absolutely gutted when they took Paul Stewart our talismanic centre forward goal machine, Paybacks a woman ain't it.

 

[SkyBlueCanuck]

I marvel that a grand total of feck all people called for a transfer ban of CFC last year when they broke spending records and arguably bought the largest prize in Europe.

City has sold 100M in players these last 12 months. We've 2 seasons worth of CL money going on this season's books (due to the Covid delay in summer of 2020).

I want us to witness the greatest piss-boil of all time this summer... And I believe that we will.