Harry Kane

[Delphinho]

Goals
Pace
Exciting
Longevity

1/4 for Kane then

 

[worsleyweb]

Who do you reckon is on the way to help fund it? Bernard seems favourite but I wouldn't like to see Eric go, that would leave us light at the back as I don't think Pep has total faith in Ake

think we will sell Jesus and Bernardo myself. 60 million and maybe 50 and end up with a minimal net spend. Laporte will be told he has to give it a go this year and we can sell him and ake next year and buy a good holding midfielder and a great left back and promote sandler as third choice centre back. Stones and Dias are sound for the next few years.

 

[ancoats]

I’m hoping it’s the other way round.
Spurs spend all the Kane money and then we pull out leaving them in the shit.
That would be glorious.
Revenge is sweet.

good thinking
then sign haaland for £63million

 

[cookster]

1/4 for Kane then

That one is the only that matters.

 

[blueparrot]

think we will sell Jesus and Bernardo myself. 60 million and maybe 50 and end up with a minimal net spend. Laporte will be told he has to give it a go this year and we can sell him and ake next year and buy a good holding midfielder and a great left back and promote sandler as third choice centre back. Stones and Dias are sound for the next few years.

Sounds like a plan.

 

[ancoats]

One is a Pep approved close to guaranteed instant success the other is a gamble.

yes a gamble but he is a monster of a striker and would bully the defenders
he did Dias last season in the champions league but ederson saved his bacon

 

[I'm Blue]

good thinking
then sign haaland for £63million

Or £100m now and loan him back : )

 

[ancoats]

Just think we are making signings which are of so much significance

English Captain
English number 10

seems to me the homegrown rule is coming in

i understand why ? but the price is wrong for me
no guarantees and has had injury problems. winning the champions league would only be our saving grace
i just think if we let haaland go to chelsea or dare i say united then it could come back to bite us

can we live without getting kane maybe ? but could we still be top dogs if chelsea or united got haaland

 

[Nellies left peg]

And posting on here when his team is playing. Wtf?

I'd rather be on here posting than watching tottingham play if I was one of their fans

 

[Sheikh rattle and roll]

yes a gamble but he is a monster of a striker and would bully the defenders
he did Dias last season in the champions league but ederson saved his bacon

Not at all that was a foul all day long

 

[ancoats]

When next year?

no ? next year he is available for £67 million
so just double our offer and pay £120 million now for haaland

 

[mccity]

yes a gamble but he is a monster of a striker and would bully the defenders
he did Dias last season in the champions league but ederson saved his bacon

I mean, Kane also made something of a mug out of Dias and Laporte with his movement and play when Tottenham last beat us.

 

[ctwrd]

i understand why ? but the price is wrong for me
no guarantees and has had injury problems. winning the champions league would only be our saving grace
i just think if we let haaland go to chelsea or dare i say united then it could come back to bite us

can we live without getting kane maybe ? but could we still be top dogs if chelsea or united got haaland

The price is irrelevant. This is Monopoly money

 

[ancoats]

The price is irrelevant. This is Monopoly money

its is ? but there has to be a limit
just take i look at barcelona and the so called elite clubs in debt and in a right mess ?

 

[David Silva]

no ? next year he is available for £67 million
so just double our offer and pay £120 million now for haaland

If Haaland was available at that price Chelsea would have signed him last week

 

[ancoats]

I mean, Kane also made something of a mug out of Dias and Laporte with his movement and play when Tottenham last beat us.

am not saying kane is not world class he is
but its the fee for a 28 year old it does not add up unless we win the champions league

 

[The Pandorica Opened]

think we will sell Jesus and Bernardo myself. 60 million and maybe 50 and end up with a minimal net spend. Laporte will be told he has to give it a go this year and we can sell him and ake next year and buy a good holding midfielder and a great left back and promote sandler as third choice centre back. Stones and Dias are sound for the next few years.

Don't see us selling both Ake and Laporte. I think this year will decide which one goes - if Stones has another blinder with Dias, Laporte will go as he's far too good to play back up. If Stones falters and Laporte gets back into the team, Ake will be sold and Stones will be the rotation option. Can't see us going from having arguably the best set of four CBs in the league to having Sandler being the rotation option in one season.

 

[dannyboiblue]

Don't see us selling both Ake and Laporte. I think this year will decide which one goes - if Stones has another blinder with Dias, Laporte will go as he's far too good to play back up. If Stones falters and Laporte gets back into the team, Ake will be sold and Stones will be the rotation option. Can't see us going from having arguably the best set of four CBs in the league to having Sandler being the rotation option in one

This is not slagging anyone but if laporte is good enough he gets himself back in the team! The best players rise to the top. Average players shit themselves and aim for the exit. Let's see who's got the balls

 

[dannyboiblue]

If spurs get Martinez kane is ours

 

[bluealf]

The price is irrelevant. This is Monopoly money

Well it isn't though is it?

FFP and books to balance say spunking 160m out on a player will mean less to spend in another season, unless we sell ourselves to balance the books.