Harry Kane

I'm With Stupid said:
Ah yeah, but it was pretty long range I think. People are acting like we battered them, which is the sort of conclusion you can only get from looking at the stats and not actually watching the game. I'd say they were comfortably the more dangerous team for the second half and a good part of the first.
Click to expand...
It was 15 yards out, bang in front of the goal and he mishit it wide. Not as bad as Fernandinho’s miss but not far off.
 
I'm With Stupid said:
Ah yeah, but it was pretty long range I think. People are acting like we battered them, which is the sort of conclusion you can only get from looking at the stats and not actually watching the game. I'd say they were comfortably the more dangerous team for the second half and a good part of the first.
Click to expand...

We should of been at least 2 up at half time, then the games done.
 
Bournemouth Blue said:
I know, but I would rather wait for another year or two than pay over the odds for a player who will never have any sell-on value, if Kane was 25 I would go full tilt for him, but he is at his peak and any money spent will only be paid off when he retires. Haaland or MBappe could play for 5-8 years and only then will they be Kane’s age.
Click to expand...
I understand what you say about sell on value, but the club will have factored that. With Kane, we know we would get 4/5 years return, but with the others, we don't know that as, notwithstanding the fact, they might not even want to come to us, they may get itchy feet after 3 seasons.
 
what you mean there was no negotiation for Grealish, I really hope at least Txiki tried to offer 60-70-80-90-95m and when all rejected he opted to give them the clause amount.

release clause is a maximum amount to pay not a minimum. its a minimum only if you want absolute 0% chance to be rejected(by club, not by player).

Odegaard has a 300m release clause at Real, watch him being sold for 40m maybe later this month.
 
BillyShears said:
What's odd is people falling for Sky's obvious bollocks. He's a member of their squad so he'll be registered to play. When they travel, if he travels with them, that will be something to talk about. Even then, he could travel and not even make the bench again. Ultimately this is the end game with Kane, so we just have to sit back and let it play out.

My opinion hasn't changed one bit. Got told last week Levy had agreed to sell at a price that we'd agreed to pay. The discussions were around the add ons. Obviously Levy wants to say he got 160 and obviously City don't want to give him that. But it'll get done IMO.
Click to expand...

Seems like a big add-on for winning the Champion's League would be the best idea.

Levy gets his valuation and I'm sure City would be happy to pay pretty much anything if it means we finally rule Europe. But maybe that's already in place and it's add-ons for niggly things like games played and all that carry-on that's holding back the progress - plus Spurs wanting to get players in without knowing they're bathing in hot-tubs of money.
 

Damanino said:
what you mean there was no negotiation for Grealish, I really hope at least Txiki tried to offer 60-70-80-90-95m and when all rejected he opted to give them the clause amount.

release clause is a maximum amount to pay not a minimum. its a minimum only if you want absolute 0% chance to be rejected(by club, not by player).

Odegaard has a 300m release clause at Real, watch him being sold for 40m maybe later this month.
Click to expand...
Yeah the no negotiation part came out all wrong. I am sure the club must have tried to get him for a lower price but it failed. But I hope you get what I meant. Even though negotiation for a lower price failed for grealish we had a fixed release clause we thought we could pay and get him even though the club didn't want to let him go. Where as if negotiations fail with spurs its the end of kane saga. I think pep also explained that in his press conference
 
domalino said:
His goal scoring record as a starter is in the same ballpark as Kane, Aguero, Henry.

He's not a good substitute, which drags his numbers down.

When we sell him, it will be like Dzeko to Roma x100. He will go somewhere, play regularly, get his confidence up and score 30-40 goals a season.
Click to expand...
30-40 goals a season. Maybe in Saudi League
 
KnaresboroughBlue said:
Cancelo had a pretty decent chance first half that he put wide if I remember correctly.
Click to expand...
Decent chance? It was a clear cut, gilt edged chance. I’d have been devastated if I missed it when I was playing for Royton. Shocking attempt for an international. That along with Ferna’s threepeny bit head, we should have been 2 up. This is the reason we lost. Not Mendy, not Ake…
 
levets said:
Decent chance? It was a clear cut, gilt edged chance. I’d have been devastated if I missed it when I was playing for Royton. Shocking attempt for an international. That along with Ferna’s threepeny bit head, we should have been 2 up. This is the reason we lost. Not Mendy, not Ake…
Click to expand...
Mahrez was main sitter for me! especially for a left footer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top