You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
DrBlueBob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2008
- Messages
- 6,675
- Team supported
- Need you ask?
More like a TENA stage I think.Are we at a TENative stage
Kane is 9 for england, dont recall that ever being an issue for him. This smells of bollocks.Hang on isn't he bloody 9 for England anyway? How on earth can this be anything but bullshit because surely if he is 9 for England and 9 for city that is a stronger marketing position than being two different numbers altogether?
We promised Kane 10, then gave it to Grealish? Why the hell would we do that?
i’m assuming it’s because he was signed first and he specifically requested that number. kane is more of a 9 anyways.
Wasnt Collymore K9?Surely K9 as a certain ring to it
He could take the lead with that
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,372
I don't doubt he's been told this, find it highly unlikely though.Especially as he's known for weeks and if it was an issue for him put a stop to all the talk and build bridges with spurs fans.Of course it isn't. It's just made-up nonsense.
100%And yet his on the ball advisors have only just picked up on it. It's a funny old game matty. I'm not shooting the messenger btw.
I love these updates / snippets from those such as yourself.
ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
K9 sniffing his own bollocks I thinkKane is 9 for england, dont recall that ever being an issue for him. This smells of bollocks.
Dunno, but even Grealish was surprised by it.We promised Kane 10, then gave it to Grealish? Why the hell would we do that?
Someone hit the nail on the head earlier in that Grealish is deemed the more marketable of the 2
Grealish looked very shocked when he saw the 10 number so he is either a good actor or it wasn´t planned at all.i’m assuming it’s because he was signed first and he specifically requested that number. kane is more of a 9 anyways.
ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
Well-Known Member
He certainly got dogs abuseWasnt Collymore K9?
Update (this is the word for word text):
“They are fuming lad, reckon he will lose millions not being number 10. Yesterday was spent trying to address it.
The kid must be getting sick of fucking gentleman’s agreements!”
The person who sent me this is a long time member of this site, they don’t contribute very much these days, but they are cool with me posting this.
Let's see which twitter 'ITK' repeats this...
theres only one carlito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 2,296
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 1980
I’m told he’ll take 7+3 or 5x2 as an alternative.
5 Hit Gibbon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2020
- Messages
- 8,376
Surely K9 as a certain ring to it
He could take the lead with that
You will get dogs abuse for suggesting K9!
Manc Born & Bred
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2005
- Messages
- 11,674
Give him number one thousand and ten (1010), he can be twice the player he was