Harry Kane

I think you signed Grealish because Pep likes him. There is no real footballing justification for signing him. More like a gift from the owners to Pep.

Is he going to be the next CR7?
No.

Is he better than KDB?
No.

Does he get more goals/assists than Sterling?
No.

Is he an improvement on Foden?
Dunno?

Do City need him?
No.

Does he half nice calves?
Yes.

Will he sell stuff?
Yes.

Does he make Pep happy?
Yes.
....parklife....
 
I think you signed Grealish because Pep likes him. There is no real footballing justification for signing him. More like a gift from the owners to Pep.

Is he going to be the next CR7?
No.

Is he better than KDB?
No.


Does he get more goals/assists than Sterling?
No.

Is he an improvement on Foden?
Dunno?

Do City need him?
No.

Does he half nice calves?
Yes.

Will he sell stuff?
Yes.

Does he make Pep happy?
Yes.
Is anybody better than KDB?
No.
 
Aren't you now arguing both sides?

You're telling me to give my head a wobble, when you're repeating exactly the point I made in my previous reply.

"I agree that De Bruyne would "understand", but I bet he'd also be happy to argue that he could have let his contract run down and got a similar deal. Sterling is probably a better comparison, because he's about to make the decision about wages/contract and letting his own contract run down."
I’m not arguing both sides. Sterling WILL be using that very argument to get the biggest pay increase he can.

But no one will be complaining to the club if we buy a £150m player for £65m and said player comes in on a bumper wage because of the transfer fee saving.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.