Del_Bosque
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 2,795
If Walkers had decided to can him or distance their brand from him because of the same private tweet, the public wouldn't be calling them right wing, pro-tory, anti-immigrant etc? And that is exactly what one-sided looks like.
By doing what the BBC did, they have shown a lack of being impartial, and are now rightly facing the reaction to it.
Walkers aren't taking money on from the public under pain of prosecution and operating under a royal charter that insists on impartiality.
If Lineker would have said the "policy is great, they are abusing the system they should be sent to Rwanda ASAP to discourage more travelling" he'd have been sacked without warning he was at least in this case given the opportunity to back down but came out with that clearly choregraphed tv appearance and doubled down.
There is a million and 1 jobs and public positions where it's ok to espouse political opinions, the role of prime time intentionally bland inoffensive middle of the road football presenter on the BBC is one of the few places it's not.