gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Maybe if they are a cleaner on a factual programme.
Maybe if they are a cleaner on a factual programme.
Those defenders of Free Speech seem very anti - Free Speech
He wants to be outraged.You got all that from ‘language of?’
Only if you are unable to see the bigger picture.
Then he shouldn’t have tweeted about Corbyn in 2017 and he shouldn’t have got on his soapbox about Qatar during the World Cup. But he did and the BBC said nothing and the government said nothing.The BBC's guidelines on impartiality explained - and do they apply to Gary Lineker?
One of the BBC's most important pillars is that of impartiality, and this is why former football star Gary Lineker was asked to step back from his sports broadcasting role.news.sky.com
It doesn't look like contractually he should have tweeted what he did reading the above.
At the end of the day, as long as you give 110%. It is what it isThink the bbc will be looking for new presenters
I would love the job my qualifications include being able to talk Shite fluently,stating the obvious
I’m the ignorant one?
They said nothing about Qatar because he was being their mouthpiece. YCNMIUThen he shouldn’t have tweeted about Corbyn in 2017 and he shouldn’t have got on his soapbox about Qatar during the World Cup. But he did and the BBC said nothing and the government said nothing.
impartiality is not a one way street.