The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 24,473
But not allowed to air it because he's paid a lot of money? I'm struggling to see the rest of your context - unless you're suggesting only 650 people in the country are allowed an opinion?of course he's allowed an opinion - you clearly didn't read the context.
That’s actually a version of MOTD that I think I’d prefer tbh.No presenter or punditry tomorrow on MOTD
The show is fucked unless they backtrack. No presenter with an ounce of self-respect will want to touch this with a 1000ft pole now.“No studio presentation or punditry” tomorrow.
It’s been burnt by the authorities…Sorry people, after searching, I can’t find his original tweet? What did it say?
He doesn't work for the BBC. He's employed by the firm that produces MOTD and so on for the BBC. Outsourcing. Quite a Tory favourite free-market idealist thing.He’s perfect entitled to his personal opinion but if he works for the BBC he should be neutral and not publicly argue with the govt (even as one as useless as this). It’s not difficult.
Prue Leith. Pro-Brexit. It is normal. It has always been normal for BBC employees not involved in current affairs to retain their rights of freedom of expression. The argument regarding current affairs presenters was that it was inappropriate for them to speak on issues because people may mistakenly believe they were carrying out their BBC duties when doing so.I'm sure there must have been at least one BBC employee to tweet something in favour of government policy in the past. Why weren't these people removed from their positions within days. I think we know why. Impartiality is only a facade where the BBC and the government is concerned.