Hazard Or Bale???

Hell no, overrated, diver, lightweight, injury prone, talent less Monkey look-alike.
not worth more than 25m
 
Bale and I said that before Hazard went to Chelsea. Bale causes panic in the PL and Europe (see Milan away). Very difficult to shut down, would ge twice as good in our team. Silva and Nasri are better than Hazard. Easy to look good in the French league.
 
We don't really know exactly this Hazard fella is made of yet. Yes, he's had a promising start to his career but it's still early days.

Bale would be a good addition but he seems to dip in and out of form and in the Prem consistency is everything.
 
salfordblues said:
We don't really know exactly this Hazard fella is made of yet. Yes, he's had a promising start to his career but it's still early days.

Bale would be a good addition but he seems to dip in and out of form and in the Prem consistency is everything.[/quote

That's because Spurs are inconsistent.
 
I think I would prefer Hazrd although the point he is unproven is fair comment. Yes Bale is a great player but we know what we are getting. Hazard could be a world beater.
 
Why Always Ste said:
Hazard wanted a more central role... he couldn't get that at City due to Silva and Nasri.... Bale would be happy on the wing.

We should go for Bale and RVP.



Keep dreaming :-)


Give spurs 20 million and Ade and buy a CB
 
PUTTYBLUE said:
Supposedly Hazards about 35 mill, would you rather have Bale for 5 mill more???

Absolutely not. Wouldn't even prefer Bale at £5m less, always thought he's been very overrated.
 
Would rather have Belhanda, just won the french league, fraction of the price but by no means a fraction of the player!
 
Bale IMO is overrated and way overvalued but I'd still be delighted to sign him. Mancini could improve him and he's association developed which allows us another foreign gem.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top