Hazard Or Bale???

Hazard wanted a more central role... he couldn't get that at City due to Silva and Nasri.... Bale would be happy on the wing.

We should go for Bale and RVP.
 
I think I would prefer Hazrd although the point he is unproven is fair comment. Yes Bale is a great player but we know what we are getting. Hazard could be a world beater.
 
Why Always Ste said:
Hazard wanted a more central role... he couldn't get that at City due to Silva and Nasri.... Bale would be happy on the wing.

We should go for Bale and RVP.



Keep dreaming :-)


Give spurs 20 million and Ade and buy a CB
 
PUTTYBLUE said:
Supposedly Hazards about 35 mill, would you rather have Bale for 5 mill more???

Absolutely not. Wouldn't even prefer Bale at £5m less, always thought he's been very overrated.
 
Would rather have Belhanda, just won the french league, fraction of the price but by no means a fraction of the player!
 
Bale IMO is overrated and way overvalued but I'd still be delighted to sign him. Mancini could improve him and he's association developed which allows us another foreign gem.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.