80s Shorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,616
gordondaviesmoustache said:Upon reflection that may have been a bit OTT, but it is natural for many to want to make their mark. It is only natural.80s Shorts said:gordondaviesmoustache said:I've just watched that, not for the first time, and it raises an interesting philosophical question:
If you knew your name was going to live down the centuries and your teachings, whatever they were, would endure and be taught throughout the world for the rest of human history, but in order to do it, you'd have to experience a death like that - would you do it?
We all seek to impose ourselves on this world as much as we are able. None of us can live forever, but we try to find ways of making our mark.
I wonder, in the world we inhabit today, how much deferred veneration people are prepared to accept. Not as much as that, I reckon.
We do not all seek to impose ourselves upon this world as much as we are able GDM. The rest ? a little silly.
It is, sadly, what turns idealistic men into genocidal monsters.
I stand by the thrust of my original question though: would Jesus (or any of us) put up with that type of death (knowing we've all got to die one day), if we knew our name was going to be influential throughout the world two thousand years later.
Surely that's not a silly question to ask?
-- Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:08 am --
I think that's a little unfair. You've taken a bit of licence with what I posted.80s Shorts said:It was GDM that was posing the question of somebody WANTING their name to live down the centuries. Nobody else.
I never asked if anyone WANTED their name to live down the centuries per se, I merely posed the question, would someone endure that type of death, if they knew it would. There is a subtle difference.
and as I said earlier it is a silly question.