Spurs always rolled over at Old Trafford for years, that changed this season. Hearts always roll over for Rangers. City always seem to roll over at Anfield . Hopefully both change like Spurs at OT has doneI hope they do it, but it has been a feature for too long. They should get a result, but I am confident that come the end of the game it will be the same old story.
So it is Celtic paranoia.lol
Spurs always rolled over at Old Trafford for years, that changed this season. Hearts always roll over for Rangers. City always seem to roll over at Anfield . Hopefully both change like Spurs at OT has done
I know, all playing well, the scumbos are unbeaten and already beaten Celtic, Kilmarnock won again yesterday away even tho it was only at Dundee and hibs beat Hamilton 6-0Just had a look at the table, Hearts, Hibs and Kilmarnock WTF is going on up there lol
Hearts need to show they can play Rangers without rolling on the bellies.
They can beat them, but I think a wee collapse is on the cards. Hope I’m wrong. History tells us when it comes to Rangers Hearts have a different approach to when they play us.
Does it? In what way does history tell ‘you’ that? Statistically, Hearts have beaten Celtic more times, yes, but over the centuries not that many more times than they have beaten Rangers, and certainly not enough times to support the oft pedalled trope of some ‘protestant’ love in.
Celtic have traditionally played more football than Rangers, whose teams traditionally relied on physicality, so results against the former are more understandable, but you let yourself down with the ‘rolling on their bellies’ slight. If your own team is not doing as well as it ought this season, you should not be looking for favours elsewhere and seeing conspiracies where there are none.
I hope Hearts and Hibs stuff the Old Firm, but the fact that the latter have had much greater wealth explains why it has happened so rarely, historically.