How do we resolve the Brexit mess?

Trump wants Europe pay more for NATO.
"If you don't pay enough, the US will quit."
But that is not ture. NATO works so well, europeans buy weapons from the US, huge money. Why quit?
I don't think any sensible European politician believe that BS.
It is just a narrative provided to the european public to make them believe "oh no, don't leave us ,we'll pay more"
 
Alvin-blue-qhd said:
Trump wants Europe pay more for NATO.
"If you don't pay enough, the US will quit."
But that is not ture. NATO works so well, europeans buy weapons from the US, huge money. Why quit?
I don't think any sensible European politician believe that BS.
It is just a narrative provided to the european public to make them believe "oh no, don't leave us ,we'll pay more"
Click to expand...
There is a consistent confusion over what NATO does and doesn't do. NATO is not run by the US, it is not a country and does not procure weapons.

If the US left NATO then procurement from the US would still continue because it's irrelevant. Saudi Arabia buys US weapons and Saudi Arabia is not a NATO country. Countries would still procur US weapons in any event because there is often very little alternative. If the UK could build its own bombs then it would but it can't so it buys American bombs, this has nothing do with NATO.

Let's put it another way, Luxembourg has a standing army of just 900 people and yet through NATO it is protected by US nuclear weapons. If the US ever withdrew from NATO then how on earth could Luxembourg achieve an equivalent level of defensive capability? In reality of course they're going to give in and pay more money.

The below graph sort of sums up the HUGE difference in scale which the EU can never match.

960x0.jpg
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The price to be paid for rejoining the EU being losing the pound and joining up to a pan-European military would be absolutely fucking hilarious.
Click to expand...

we are not re-joining because even with the up-swell of support to do so here 27 other countries don't want to know. We are not a good faith actor as yet - we still have not implemented in full the Brexit that the last lot agreed with them so how can they even negotiate with us in good faith?
Also those 27 countries have their own shit to deal with at home and the EU Parliament has EU stuff to be getting on with.
Its going to take some years to prove we are worthy of negotiating with and that a change of Govt won't just mean Brexit rears its head again and say 10 years of negotiations prove to be wasted. Don't bother yourself with signing up to the Euro we need to implement things like the import and export checks we said we would and other agreements to show we are worth them even answering the door to when we knock.
 
inbetween said:
960x0.jpg
Click to expand...
Tbf, that rather large number for the US presupposes those monies are walled off for NATO, which, of course, they are not. However, for most of the other countries without a global footprint, their monies are directed at NATO.

While one might never see the “NATO money” number, one should be aware that, while still outsized in absolute terms, it may be much closer to the 2% requirement.

Additionally, the U.S. presence in many of the NATO countries brings with it innumerable economic gains for the host nation, which are completely separate from the pure military spend one thinks of.
 
ChicagoBlue said:
Tbf, that rather large number for the US presupposes those monies are walled off for NATO, which, of course, they are not. However, for most of the other countries without a global footprint, their monies are directed at NATO.

While one might never see the “NATO money” number, one should be aware that, while still outsized in absolute terms, it may be much closer to the 2% requirement.

Additionally, the U.S. presence in many of the NATO countries brings with it innumerable economic gains for the host nation, which are completely separate from the pure military spend one thinks of.
Click to expand...
The one thing that binds NATO countries together is the pooled capability. It means that US fighter jets operate alongside the RAF, it means that NATO countries are protected by US/UK/French nuclear weapons. However, NATO cannot utilise assets that do not exist which is why absolute defence spending is important and NATO budget contributions aren't important at all.

I think the huge difference in defence spending is what Trump was perhaps threatening about, especially as less than half of NATO members contribute the 2% obligation.

I mention US defence spending purely because it just eclipses anything else in Europe or even the world. As a result the US has capabilities that most countries in NATO do not possess. It just makes sense that any US withdrawal would be a complete disaster and members would probably look to avoid it by caving in to any reasonable US demands.
 
inbetween said:
The one thing that binds NATO countries together is the pooled capability. It means that US fighter jets operate alongside the RAF, it means that NATO countries are protected by US/UK/French nuclear weapons. However, NATO cannot utilise assets that do not exist which is why absolute defence spending is important and NATO budget contributions aren't important at all.

I think the huge difference in defence spending is what Trump was perhaps threatening about, especially as less than half of NATO members contribute the 2% obligation.

I mention US defence spending purely because it just eclipses anything else in Europe or even the world. As a result the US has capabilities that most countries in NATO do not possess. It just makes sense that any US withdrawal would be a complete disaster and members would probably look to avoid it by caving in to any reasonable US demands.
Click to expand...
Trump just wants to look and sound tough, and if he can force someone into a deal to make that happen, even better!

As a bully, he just needs someone to stand up to him and he folds like a cheap suit or lies like a rug to try to deflect from his personal failures. He will say anything to not be seen to be personally failing.

However, on the whole military budget, size vs percentage contribution and so on, I recently saw an interesting factoid…

IMG_1537.jpeg

That puts into perspective the magnitude of American military might and its projection into theatre.
 
Last edited:
More great news from the FT on the biggest economic own goal in recent British history. Brexit voters can be proud of their contribution to British red tape and pointless expense. To be fair, people are being employed although it’s more in the spirit of old Communist regimes inventing pointless jobs for people to do :)

New UK Border Controls

‘One UK business, HunPro, a speciality importer of Hungarian foods, told the Financial Times it had to increase its staffing by 20 per cent just to deal with the paperwork from the new checks. The company, which employs 20 people, took on four more people and said it had incurred a total of £8,000 in extra charges since the border was introduced. “It’s just a huge extra expense for nothing,” said managing director Fulop Illes.’ @FT
 
BobKowalski said:
More great news from the FT on the biggest economic own goal in recent British history. Brexit voters can be proud of their contribution to British red tape and pointless expense. To be fair, people are being employed although it’s more in the spirit of old Communist regimes inventing pointless jobs for people to do :)

New UK Border Controls

‘One UK business, HunPro, a speciality importer of Hungarian foods, told the Financial Times it had to increase its staffing by 20 per cent just to deal with the paperwork from the new checks. The company, which employs 20 people, took on four more people and said it had incurred a total of £8,000 in extra charges since the border was introduced. “It’s just a huge extra expense for nothing,” said managing director Fulop Illes.’ @FT
Click to expand...

Here is the full article not behind a pay wall

 
Fascinating "On Your Farm" on radio 4. A Kent farm manager of fruit farms. He's from a village in Bulgaria, came to pick fruit to fund university, and now manages 850 hectares (think polytunnels on three Heaton Parks). 300 people from his village come each year, the old people stay at home, and the village has the best and newest housing.

But the days when most of the workers were Poles are long gone. Now Poland's economy (in the EU) is better, workers are now mostly from "the Stans" (Kazakhstan etc). The latter tend to be shorter so the "tables" the fruit grow on in the polytunnels have to be different heights (bending down to the ground is old hat).

Brits don't want seasonal jobs (or 5.30 am starts) and wouldn't be likely to learn to speak six languages like he does. And it's not "unskilled labour" so getting the same people back each year is important.

But the main problem is a scheme that limits seasonal visas to 6 months, two years in advance, when they have to plan planting many years in advance. (Farmers not planting if they didn't know if the crops could be picked was an early Brexit disbenefit.)

And some automation - a mildew-killing "light arch" driving itself over the tables.

www.bbc.co.uk

On Your Farm - From fruit picker to farm manager - BBC Sounds

Charlotte Smith meets a Bulgarian fruit picker turned farm manager in Kent.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Vic said:
That would be the EU red tape that didn't matter until we left the EU. What should we do about it? We can't leave twice.
Click to expand...

why not? I am announcing tonight that I am divorcing my wife whom I divorced in 1992 - we never remarried
 
Just seen the latest news and immediately thought(after wondering if my £1500 holiday is now beyond me at £1502) of checking out the pant pissing thread.

Quiet so far, come on guys surely a decade on you ain't suffering from i want my way fatigue?
 
Ifwecouldjust....... said:
Waking up this morning to news of the €7 charge to enter the Eu from next year and the gammon being interviewed saying '' its typical of the Eu''


its sooooo funny that people get what they voted for ........and then moan about it.
Click to expand...
it's a good idea from the EU, always best to know who fk is coming into your country, surely people can't moan about a 6 quid charge, I mean have these fkkas never paid for an Indian visa lol Jesus they would be in cardiac arrest
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top