How do we resolve the Brexit mess?

It’s actually insane that anyone would actually think that.

It is but as @BrianW has said there is a rampant form of insanity that this country suffers from in the form of its exceptionalism. Most countries have it to some degree and it can serve it's purpose but in this instance it's ultimately done for us. Given its existed since Napoleonic times we shouldn't be surprised it's taken something this catastrophic to hopefully start truly weening us of it in coming generations.

The great sadness for me was we actually seemed to be temporing that exceptionalism quite well, especially given the way the teaching of WWII in this country for many years actually fed it, and we looked like we were adjusting well. You could strongly argue we had just the 'right' amount of exceptionalism in relation to the EU through to just before the referendum, in effect we had the deal of the century. But then three centuries of hubris caught up with us and we fucked it.

Now that ship has sailed I suspect that climate change will in large part determine the economic shape of the world in the near centuries to come. Geography always seems to get it's paws on history in the end. Haven't read enough yet to try and understand that properly but I would have thought becoming a powerhouse in technology that addresses these challenges might be one of the ways to improve our lot near term but f all chance of that at the moment I suspect.
 
It is but as @BrianW has said there is a rampant form of insanity that this country suffers from in the form of its exceptionalism. Most countries have it to some degree and it can serve it's purpose but in this instance it's ultimately done for us. Given its existed since Napoleonic times we shouldn't be surprised it's taken something this catastrophic to hopefully start truly weening us of it in coming generations.

The great sadness for me was we actually seemed to be temporing that exceptionalism quite well, especially given the way the teaching of WWII in this country for many years actually fed it, and we looked like we were adjusting well. You could strongly argue we had just the 'right' amount of exceptionalism in relation to the EU through to just before the referendum, in effect we had the deal of the century. But then three centuries of hubris caught up with us and we fucked it.

Now that ship has sailed I suspect that climate change will in large part determine the economic shape of the world in the near centuries to come. Geography always seems to get it's paws on history in the end. Haven't read enough yet to try and understand that properly but I would have thought becoming a powerhouse in technology that addresses these challenges might be one of the ways to improve our lot near term but f all chance of that at the moment I suspect.
Plus our temperate climate may make us an attractive place to live and invest if temperatures continue to rise.

I think you are right about our perceived exceptionalism and to some extent it is understandable. For an island of this size to dominate the world as it has, empirically, linguistically and culturally is actually remarkable. And I suppose the latter of those two mean we will probably be ok, long term.

I think this vote was maybe the lesson in humility we needed as a nation to wake us up to the reality of our place in the modern world, where isolationism (which is what we have unequivocally chosen) is wholly contrary to our national self-interest. I think some who voted for Brexit assumed that leaving a trading and political union with our nearest neighbours would not necessarily mean that we would become more isolated, but that is a perspective that is simply not rooted in logic or common sense.

You are absolutely correct that we had the deal of the century. That was because the EU was scared of losing us, and was crafted in order to appease the sizeable rump of inveterate Eurosceptics within our populace. The EU has now realised that they are completely fine without us, arguably better off, and now that those Eurosceptics have got their way with a hard Brexit we are undeniably worse off, at least for the foreseeable. This is why I repeatedly say we’ve fucking blown it, because we absolutely have.

We’ve just got to make the best of where we find ourselves, but for me, central to that is building bridges again, or at least starting to. I believe we have acted in an egregiously rude and disrespectful way to our closest neighbours and have been reduced as a nation as a consequence. We have made ourselves a laughing stock and we need to show a bit of humility and contrition so we can, at the very least, have broadly positive relations with our closest neighbours going forward, which we presently do not, and for which we should take the overwhelming responsibility for.
 
Yes, finally a thread about what to do about improving things rather than moaning about what has happened!

Contrary to what "some" people on here may think about my political leaning, i knew Brexit wouldn't go well.
I knew there would be a price to pay. That things would go downhill, at least for a while.
However, this was more to do with the people in power. If you don't have a leader with big balls and strength, then it was never going to work. We didn't, so there is no surprise on my part.
People here like to split people into Brexiteers and Remoaners. I class myself as an Inbetweener!

I have never been a fan of the European Union. It is a mishmash of self-serving countries masquerading a some sort of family. But a pack is stronger than a lone wolf!
As a trading pact, i thought it was good if not ideal. Some of the workers rights and protection it afforded was great for example. We also got back a lot of the money put in back as subsidies, so that was never an issue. Immigration needed to be better controlled, not stopped.
I was a fan of us dumping the pound. If we was part of the Union, then that should have went.
But they had other aspirations, and the directions some wanted it to go was worrying.
Allowing some Countries into the Union that shouldn't really be, was only to assert control and dominance over them. Some of the EU leaders were toxic and had their own personal agendas.

So there were parts i liked and parts about the Union i didn't.
I was hoping a near miss with the vote might have been enough to wake everybody up, and for the Union to make changes for the better.
However, being self employed, i like risks and like a challenge. So my attitude since was be positive and try and make it work. Others just seem to want to moan.
I buy from all over the world, so buying from the EU is no different (paperwork wise). I was hoping for more trading agreements to be done by now. Covid seems to have stalled some of them. Changing leader every few months hasn't helped.

So as for a solution.
Re-joining doesn't seem viable at the moment. We have seen recently the self-serving vindictiveness of the EU in all it's glory.
I cannot see anything they have done to make it attractive to re-join. It would be a hard sell if it was going to be on worse terms than before. So like the Remoaners, they need to let it go and work constructively to find a solution for the future. Without EU reforms, it's never going to work.

So at least for now, we should adopt the US dollar, align ourselves with them, and fill in the Channel Tunnel...There you go simple! :)
I just wanted to say that it was very refreshing to see a post that recognises the reality of what the situation was before (and since) 2016 and the direction that the EU was (and is) hellbent on going - increasingly full integration - not just a trading bloc.

That is where the denizens that haunt this thread deceive themselves. They bang on pretty much exclusively about the negative impacts of leaving a trading bloc - but, before the referendum, the same people were denying categorically that there were any aims/direction towards increasingly full (including political) integration - just look how those aims has advanced in the last 7 years.

They deny what was clear - despite the EU setting out those aims very clearly in their published strategies - years before the referendum and updated on an ongoing basis since.

If the EU had remained the EEC - the trading bloc - that we joined then I strongly doubt there would have been any chance of a Leave vote - but the EU has been hijacked by politicians determined to implement the 'Jean Monet vision' of a United States of Europe. They inch ever closer to that - and now they are well past the point of no return.

You will hear how countries are queuing up to join - but where are these countries? Exclusively towards the east and of course they want to join!! They are pretty much impoverished and are promised serious investments (inducements) if they join.

Who is going to pay for that? The EU makes sure that the members, such as the UK used to be, pay for those inducements, and there is also the ever increasing debt mountain which is the elephant in the room that is never discussed on this thread. Increasingly Holland and other such nations are increasing their contributions and their share of debt liabilities - the UK would have been a prime contributor.

Countries like Greece and Italy 'toe the line' because the bail-outs they have received have been contingent on 'good behaviour'.

You will hear posters spouting on about 'opt-outs' and 'vetoes' - again conveniently ignoring that the EU was already well on a path to making such 'special conditions' impotent - the truth is inconvenient and not to be tolerated.

The blinkered people on this thread cannot allow themselves to consider the wider facts. They can only resort to shouting down any alternative views - crassly stating that people that do not conform are either racists or people who wish to live in some Britannia world of UK exceptionalism.

They cannot debate - only attack and ridicule.

I am sure that once I read beyond your excellent post - I will find to some degree you are attracting such attention from the pack for holding such views.

I do not post on this thread because there is no balance and the 'regular' posters seem to be able to be as extreme as they wish - while those with alternative views seem to disappear if they continue to dissent.

Anyway - I did not mean to make such a long post

I wish you well with your objectivity - although I strongly doubt your views will be tolerated and I expect that you will soon find a 'gang' of posters coming on to ridicule what you post - rather than debate it.

Good luck mate
 
Last edited:
I just wanted to say that it was very refreshing to see a post that recognises the reality of what the situation was before (and since) 2016 and the direction that the EU was (and is) hellbent on going - increasingly full integration - not just a trading bloc.

That is where the denizens that haunt this thread deceive themselves. They bang on pretty much exclusively about the negative impacts of leaving a trading bloc - but, before the referendum, the same people were denying categorically that there was any aims/direction towards increasingly full (including political) integration - just look how those aims has advanced in the last 7 years.

They deny what is clear - despite the EU setting out those aims very clearly in their published strategies - years before the referendum and updated on an ongoing basis since.

If the EU had remained the EEC trading bloc that we joined then I strongly doubt there would have been any chance of a Leave vote - but the EU has been hijacked by politicians determined to implement the 'Jan Monet vision' of a United States of Europe. They inch ever closer to that - and now they are well past the point of no return.

You will hear how countries are queuing up to join - but where are these countries? Exclusively towards the east and they of course want to join - they are pretty much impoverished and are promised serious investments (inducements) if they join. Who is going to pay for that? - the EU makes sure that the members, such as the UK used to be, pay for those inducements - and also there is an ever increasing debt mountain which is the elephant in the room that is never discussed on this thread. Increasingly Holland and other such nations are increasing their contributions and share debt liabilities - the UK was have been a prime contributor. Countries like Greece and Italy 'toe the line' because the bail-outs they have received have been contingent on 'good behaviour'.

They have spouted on about 'opt-outs' and 'vetoes' - again conveniently ignoring that the EU was already well on a path to making such 'special conditions' impotent - the truth is inconvenient and not to be tolerated.

The blinkered people on this thread cannot allow themselves to considered the wider facts. They can only resort to shouting down any alternative views - crassly stating that people that do not conform are either racists or people who wish to live in some Britannia world of UK exceptionalism.

They cannot debate - only attack and ridicule.

I am sure that once a read beyond your excellent post - I will find to some degree you are attracting such attention from the pack for holding such views.

I do not post on this thread because there is no balance and the mods have in the past worked to support the 'regular' posters with thread or forum bans for people with alternative views if they continue to dissent.

Anyway - I did not mean to make such a long message.

I wish you well with your objectivity - although I strongly doubt your views will be tolerated and you will soon find a 'gang' of posters coming on to ridicule what you post - rather than debate it.

Good luck mate
Far more Remainers would welcome being part of that closer political union now than before the vote, which has definitely made us more polarised as a nation. And unhappier.

The vote, the flawed process, the Parliamentary farce that followed it, the revolving door PMs it has given rise to, our Zombie government that ‘got Brexit done’, the way the outcome was implemented - have all been toxic for this nation. The victors were egregiously ungracious in their victory, in what was a close vote. As it was always going to be. This is in contrast with the compromises that were afforded to Eurosceptics in our arrangement with the EU before the referendum. What a ridiculously short-sighted and divisive thing to do. We are divided right down the middle as a nation on this subject and probably always will be - and we just have to learn to live with that.

We had to leave. Of course we did. I thought people asking for a second referendum were bang out of order. We’d made our choice, however flawed and wrong, but we absolutely had to abide by it, whatever the consequences (and there definitely were potential opportunities) and try and make the best of it.

But we have made the worst of it.

Do you actually think we’re a better, more harmonious society than we were in 2016?
 
I just wanted to say that it was very refreshing to see a post that recognises the reality of what the situation was before (and since) 2016 and the direction that the EU was (and is) hellbent on going - increasingly full integration - not just a trading bloc.

That is where the denizens that haunt this thread deceive themselves. They bang on pretty much exclusively about the negative impacts of leaving a trading bloc - but, before the referendum, the same people were denying categorically that there was any aims/direction towards increasingly full (including political) integration - just look how those aims has advanced in the last 7 years.

They deny what is clear - despite the EU setting out those aims very clearly in their published strategies - years before the referendum and updated on an ongoing basis since.

If the EU had remained the EEC trading bloc that we joined then I strongly doubt there would have been any chance of a Leave vote - but the EU has been hijacked by politicians determined to implement the 'Jan Monet vision' of a United States of Europe. They inch ever closer to that - and now they are well past the point of no return.

You will hear how countries are queuing up to join - but where are these countries? Exclusively towards the east and they of course want to join - they are pretty much impoverished and are promised serious investments (inducements) if they join. Who is going to pay for that? - the EU makes sure that the members, such as the UK used to be, pay for those inducements - and also there is an ever increasing debt mountain which is the elephant in the room that is never discussed on this thread. Increasingly Holland and other such nations are increasing their contributions and share debt liabilities - the UK was have been a prime contributor. Countries like Greece and Italy 'toe the line' because the bail-outs they have received have been contingent on 'good behaviour'.

They have spouted on about 'opt-outs' and 'vetoes' - again conveniently ignoring that the EU was already well on a path to making such 'special conditions' impotent - the truth is inconvenient and not to be tolerated.

The blinkered people on this thread cannot allow themselves to considered the wider facts. They can only resort to shouting down any alternative views - crassly stating that people that do not conform are either racists or people who wish to live in some Britannia world of UK exceptionalism.

They cannot debate - only attack and ridicule.

I am sure that once a read beyond your excellent post - I will find to some degree you are attracting such attention from the pack for holding such views.

I do not post on this thread because there is no balance and the mods have in the past worked to support the 'regular' posters with thread or forum bans for people with alternative views if they continue to dissent.

Anyway - I did not mean to make such a long message.

I wish you well with your objectivity - although I strongly doubt your views will be tolerated and you will soon find a 'gang' of posters coming on to ridicule what you post - rather than debate it.

Good luck mate
Shit rant...
 
I just wanted to say that it was very refreshing to see a post that recognises the reality of what the situation was before (and since) 2016 and the direction that the EU was (and is) hellbent on going - increasingly full integration - not just a trading bloc.

That is where the denizens that haunt this thread deceive themselves. They bang on pretty much exclusively about the negative impacts of leaving a trading bloc - but, before the referendum, the same people were denying categorically that there was any aims/direction towards increasingly full (including political) integration - just look how those aims has advanced in the last 7 years.

They deny what is clear - despite the EU setting out those aims very clearly in their published strategies - years before the referendum and updated on an ongoing basis since.

If the EU had remained the EEC trading bloc that we joined then I strongly doubt there would have been any chance of a Leave vote - but the EU has been hijacked by politicians determined to implement the 'Jan Monet vision' of a United States of Europe. They inch ever closer to that - and now they are well past the point of no return.

You will hear how countries are queuing up to join - but where are these countries? Exclusively towards the east and they of course want to join - they are pretty much impoverished and are promised serious investments (inducements) if they join. Who is going to pay for that? - the EU makes sure that the members, such as the UK used to be, pay for those inducements - and also there is an ever increasing debt mountain which is the elephant in the room that is never discussed on this thread. Increasingly Holland and other such nations are increasing their contributions and share debt liabilities - the UK was have been a prime contributor. Countries like Greece and Italy 'toe the line' because the bail-outs they have received have been contingent on 'good behaviour'.

They have spouted on about 'opt-outs' and 'vetoes' - again conveniently ignoring that the EU was already well on a path to making such 'special conditions' impotent - the truth is inconvenient and not to be tolerated.

The blinkered people on this thread cannot allow themselves to considered the wider facts. They can only resort to shouting down any alternative views - crassly stating that people that do not conform are either racists or people who wish to live in some Britannia world of UK exceptionalism.

They cannot debate - only attack and ridicule.

I am sure that once a read beyond your excellent post - I will find to some degree you are attracting such attention from the pack for holding such views.

I do not post on this thread because there is no balance and the mods have in the past worked to support the 'regular' posters with thread or forum bans for people with alternative views if they continue to dissent.

Anyway - I did not mean to make such a long message.

I wish you well with your objectivity - although I strongly doubt your views will be tolerated and you will soon find a 'gang' of posters coming on to ridicule what you post - rather than debate it.

Good luck mate
And what is wrong with further integration, what are the negatives?
 
I would much rather be a part of that, than where we find ourselves now.
Me too. The rant seemed a little ‘All about me, I’m being persecuted and not allowed to have a say’ when the opposite is true. Most are waiting for ongoing debate and would happily entertain decent discussion on the issue. Instead, we are left in somewhat of an echo chamber due to their being nothing tangible to debate.

We live with what we have got and I’m hoping that the next government heal some of the wounds that have been caused by the referendum, home and abroad.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.